this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
600 points (94.4% liked)

memes

9615 readers
2636 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I dunno. Speaking as a male, the reason I see older men seeking far younger women is that it's easy to seem like the smartest guy in the room when you're also the oldest guy in the room. You can project an air of worldliness that makes you seem smarter and wiser than you really are. You can get younger women, legal women, fawning over you because they're young and haven't really experienced enough of life and people to be wise to the bullshit. They avoid women around their own age because they've been around, they know all the tricks.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, which falls under the risks I mentioned not to be ignorant to.

But also, sometimes you're a 23 year old who gets put on assignment at work with a 31 year old coworker and are surprised how well you hit it off.

My point wasn't "yay age gap relationships!," it was to evaluate the world around you with the necessary nuanced rather than reductively.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

No but it's weird. I bet you didn't think of that

/s

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah. Not impossible for the to be healthy relationships but those appear to be the minority. With age generalay comes other factors, like financial resources, that strike a relationship power imbalance.

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you are arguing about it than. The post doesn't say we should vote for age gaps in relationships to be banned. Supposedly you think it's good to talk about the downsides of these relationships, but here you are, calling it a "conservative Trojan horse". It seems like you actually do not want people to criticise it.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I want them to criticize the right aspects. In general I want us to approach the world looking for more nuance, not looking for reductivism.

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I tend to agree with most of what you said but the main reason this is even a thing is that women typically date older men who are already established. Dating in your early 20s is basically impossible because your female counterparts aren't looking for guys that are just starting out or figuring out who they are. Women seek security and sustainability and the 28 year old guy who knows himself and has his own house, good job and car looks far more appealing than the 21 year old who's living with his parents or going to school. I'm not even criticizing women here, it makes sense.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Women seek security and sustainability

This is a huge overgeneralization and sounding like it might have come from incel thinking, do you have a source to say how many young women are primarily looking for that?

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Call it whatever you want, I guess but it seems like you're projecting. There's nothing controversial about the idea that women seek security or that men are biologically attracted to young women.

You're asking for a source which is funny because you're the one making the counterargument. I'd expect you to have provided something. I imagine that with your bait insult(incel, lol, I'm married but okay) you're not really looking for an intelligent discussion here. But on the off-chance you are, here you go.

Article https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/201907/do-women-really-prefer-men-money-over-looks

One of many studies referenced in the article

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704919852921

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That wasn't an insult, it was my best guess as to where that idea came from. It's also not calling you an incel, just that I suspect incels came up with that idea and it somehow got to you (one potential way is that you are in incel, but again, that's one way), so I'm annoyed you misinterpreted my careful wording.

I read that study you referenced, and it found that ~50% of both men and women rate "Good earning capacity" between 1 (desirable) and 2 (important), the averages being ~1.1 and ~1.6 respectively. This study shows that women care about it more than men, but, reading the results, they care somewhere between "desirable" and "important", discrediting your idea that "Dating in your early 20s is basically impossible because your female counterparts aren’t looking for guys that are just starting out or figuring out who they are". Looking at their box and whisker plots, it seems you'll find significantly more women than men for whom bad earning capacity is a deal breaker, but that does not mean that most do.

Is it a factor when dating? Yes. Is it an overwhelming factor on average? This study says no.

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So your argument is based on opinion yeah?

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What argument do you mean? I was suspicious of your claim, based on my biases of course, but I used your study to back up that suspicion. I'm not making an affirmative claim.

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you're just babbling on then? You asked me to source my argument and argued it was incorrect while insinuating I'm an incel, yet you provide no source of your own other than your opinion. This is why I don't reply half of the time. You effectively wasted my time. Please don't argue someone else's claims unless you're prepared to offer more than your opinion.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You must be trolling, I've said I didn't call you an incel yet you repeat it, and I cited your own source to disprove you yet you call that opinion. What source am I supposed to cite if not the very one you used? I'm merely arguing the null hypothesis, I don't have to provide a positive claim/source, only dig holes in yours (which I did).

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"yeah your study supports your idea but not as much as you think"

Great analysis there, you really opened up my mind

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

It doesn't though, please reread.