this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
586 points (97.9% liked)

RPGMemes

10194 readers
936 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (19 children)

I mean, the same could be said of GMs that run a module without telling the table they're running a module "to keep you from looking it up", etc. Personally, I flat-out tell my players I'll be running a certain module and that I'll be considering it like jazz does sheet music. In fact, when I ran Xanathar's arc after it's release, the silent business partner to his faction was an ages-old black market syndicate headed by a mimic mafia (with changelings as their juvenile stage, tasked with learning humanoid ways via a sort of rumspringa).

Establishing that not only can anything be a mimic, but the resonant fact that said mimics were more interested in observing rather than mindlessly ambushing outright was far more paranoia-inducing than any stereotypical expectation, NGL. It wasn't long before the party was all but wishing for the wardrobe/carriage/over-large chest/ornate tome to just attack and get it over with. 🤣🤘🏼

edit: spelling, clarity

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I’d argue that it’s more fun to bury the lead on a module/set dungeon, to prevent any (even subconscious) meta-gaming from upsetting the play between more/less seasoned players, but I do like the “jazz and sheet music” analogy.

If someone clicks/is told you’re using Tomb of Horrors, they’ll know more than a player who is experiencing that for the first time organically. Obviously applying that and not breaking PC-player knowledge divide is the players issue to maintain, but they’ll still have that seed lurking in their brain about the upcoming set pieces

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Lede*

And, I don't necessarily disagree, though it's the latter half of the statement that clarifies the problematic thinking: removing player agency is not a good first step.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Fair point, though I can only assume that it won't be long before people are mispronouncing it IRL, for reasons not unlike "decimate" vs. "devastate". 🫣 Ah, the consequences of underfunded education at the national scale. 🥹

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)