this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
61 points (91.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8781 readers
362 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

steam is a monopoly

they're engaging in price fixing, which is pretty much by definition monopolistic activity, by denying publishers the ability to price games lower on other distribution platforms

if ea, the otherwise second largest distributor on the platform, can't compete without crawling its way back to steam, then it's pretty clearly a monopoly

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

The price fixing is only for steam keys which is completely reasonable.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The mere existence of the Epic shop, let alone Humble, Itch, hell, the ifcomp.org and /usr/ports/games exposes your wild hyperbole.

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

"exposes your wild hyperbole" lmao

your argument is that all these organisations are successively: setting up shop, attempting to compete with steam, and then failing, should be all the proof you need that steam has a monopoly on the PC market

comcast doesn't have less of a monopoly on internet just because google fiber exists in one city somewhere