this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
564 points (94.8% liked)

Games

16946 readers
392 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
564
Starfield is now mostly negative in recent reviews (store.steampowered.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
271 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can't even get 40 hours playtime in most games.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If you can't get 40 hours out of a AAA game then it wasn't a AAA game.

[–] WytchStar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Most games don't aim to provide hundreds.

[–] finishsneezing@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True, but games are different and an open-world game should be fun for far longer than for example a linear shooter, due to density and freedom with sandbox elements.