Technology

59086 readers

3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

847

Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

419 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 86 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.” I mean they are litterally Condoning bigotry.

"His response similarly doesn’t engage other questions from the Substackers Against Nazis authors, like why these policies allow it to moderate spam and newsletters from sex workers but not Nazis."

Doesn't seem very consistent.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 51 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Substack: Nazis are cool, but you better not be selling sex related shit! We have standards!

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"We do not condone Nazi propaganda, but we are very concerned about sex work causing social degeneracy."

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Substack is likely very concerned about the purity of the volk

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Condone (transitive verb): To overlook, forgive, or disregard (an offense) without protest or censure.

Neat.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Interesting, I generally think of the Merriam-Webster definition:

to regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless

Or perhaps even further than that: actually approving of something. Guess “condone” is a little weaker of a word than I thought. But its popularity calls for being extra careful of even overlooking wrongdoing.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Funny how words mean things