this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
687 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
6260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knocturnal@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

AI with all those sensors prob drives better than many city drivers I interact daily changing lanes and doing parallel parking.

[–] danque@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And don't forget the human panic response. One of my primary reasons to only allow ai driving. People that kick on the gas in an emergency situation should not be allowed to drive ever, unless hitting the gas was the right choice of course. But seeing people not stop but hit the gas in a panic is the worst thing to see happening.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Years ago (maybe 2009ish) my mother got rear ended 4-5 times by the same person at a red light. They hit her, and kept accidentally hitting the gas instead of the brake over and over. It probably happens more often than we think.... but there will always be people lying to themselves and others that they are good drivers.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

California has had several high profile problems with self driving cars. This is going to be a disaster, physically and politically. This is literally just rich people buying a legal defense for hitting pedestrians. There's going to be outrage the first time it happens and it turns out the driver wasn't even looking at the road, or was drunk.

[–] Knocturnal@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ofc there are gonna be issues but I kinda asume drunk driver and person who lack observation has lower chance of hitting someone with car that has any kind of assistance. There are prob more times driving assistance helped than caused problem.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, but that shouldn't absolve them of responsibility. They should still be required to pay attention and apply the brakes or take control if required. These systems do not have a 100 percent safety record. So to say we don't need the human as a check anymore is bonkers.