this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
20 points (88.5% liked)

Selfhosted

37909 readers
408 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mooching off this other post

Primary question: What do people do for their reverse proxies (and associated ACME clients)? Do you have a single unified one? Or do you use separate proxies for each stack? Or some mess in between?

My use case question: For example, I have a (mess that is a) Nextcloud instance with a separate stack with nginx and ACME, a SearXng that wants to run caddy (but has shoved into the nginx).

But now I have a Lemmy docker that has a custom(?) nginx instance, should I just port it to my existing nginx or run them side by side?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] witten@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Since nobody has responded to the ACME / Let's Encrypt part of the question yet, I'll chime in: I also use Traefik as a reverse proxy (and an ACME client), one unified instance per machine. (There are some exceptions, like for Mailu that requires its own nginx reverse proxy.) But for Let's Encrypt, I recently switched from the TLS challenge to the DNS challenge. That required switching my DNS server from CoreDNS to PowerDNS, but thus far it seems totally worth it. Now I can easily get TLS certs for servers on my private network at home without opening them up to the internet for HTTP/TLS challenges.

[–] msinfo32@lemmy.msinfo32.uk 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Can you expand on more detail on how your TLS certs work? Looking to do similar.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Here's an overview of the Let's Encrypt DNS challenge type in case you haven't seen it: https://letsencrypt.org/docs/challenge-types/#dns-01-challenge

Basically, when Traefik goes to request or renew a certificate, Let's Encrypt tries to look up a special DNS record on your domain so you can prove that the request for the certificate is legit. To make that work, Traefik first hits your DNS provider via API and temporarily inserts that special record so it's there when Let's Encrypt performs the lookup for it. In my particular case, I'm using self-hosted PowerDNS and it's built-in API (configured to only respond via a Wireguard tunnel). But you don't have to self-host DNS for this to work.. Traefik has a long list of supported providers: https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/https/acme/#dnschallenge

[–] msinfo32@lemmy.msinfo32.uk 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh this look great, thanks!

So there is no port forwarding needed? Works behind CG-NAT?

[–] witten@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No port forwarding needed and works behind CG-NAT—assuming your DNS server is hosted elsewhere.

[–] msinfo32@lemmy.msinfo32.uk 1 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)