this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
86 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

55964 readers
3407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fifteen months into the regulatory review process, Figma and Adobe no longer see a path toward regulatory approval of our proposed acquisition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] electro1@infosec.pub 19 points 7 months ago (7 children)

This is really good news ๐Ÿฅณ

Figma is such a great project I use it all the time, even for Random thoughts, and adobe was going to ruin it by making it part of their suite of apps, and of course making the free tier worthless or removing it altogether

[โ€“] hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was very disappointed when Adobe tried to acquire figma, I switched from XD to figma only to minimize my digital experience from Adobe. It's a great news

[โ€“] electro1@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago

I didn't like the workflow of AdobeXD and the product seemed badly put together, like half offline/half online

Also I wanted to use Linux :-)

Adobe love their money, they buy the competition and tie it to their creative cloud, which means they also love DRM, I was disappointed when they bought that 3D texturing software ( forgot it's name ) even though I don't use it, but I hate to see stuff like this happen because it kills innovation

time to revive that buggy adobeXD I guess .... xD

load more comments (5 replies)