this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
336 points (95.9% liked)

Fediverse

26909 readers
152 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Honestly? I don't trust Meta, but I like that they're implementing federation.

It will allow me to follow famous people or brands that only have a Threads account through the privacy of my Mastodon/Lemmy/whatever app, so I'm not forced to use Meta's official apps, which are famously riddled with trackers and whatnot.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I didn't think about that. One to many brand marketing. One might even call it.. web 1.0

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

The fact that this is possible tells me that functionality will be phased out. No shot Meta would leave all that theoretical cash on the table.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure but then anyone whose ever interacted with you, outside of Meta, will be susceptible to Meta's privacy issues even if they block you or are only on instances that block threads because their previous comments will be on your content. At least from my understanding, that's how defederating and blocking goes. If I'm wrong, let me know but if not it's going to get hard knowing who we can interact with in the fediverse if they're also interacting with threads.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

It'll look the same way it does interacting with different mastodon instances.