this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
47 points (82.2% liked)

Fediverse

17671 readers
24 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
47
Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation (nerdica.net)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by masimatutu@nerdica.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation

Since what content users might want to see is quite unlikely to match which servers the admins tolerate, choosing instance on the Fediverse can be quite complicated, which is inconvenient and off-putting for new users.

For this reason, and simply that the Fediverse is stronger united, I believe defederation should ideally be reserved for illegal content and extreme cases. If Fediverse platforms would allow instances to simply block the rest for users by default, the user experience would be the same, unless they decide otherwise.

@fediverse #fediverse #defederation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masimatutu@nerdica.net 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hear you, and that's why I'm suggesting the implementation of default instance blocks before more open federation.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who builds those default lists? Because most social media platforms are tolerant of transphobia for example, as long as it's "civil".

[–] masimatutu@nerdica.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I mean that admins select instances that are blocked by default for users. Kinda like a soft defederation.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Ok, I can see that. Hard and soft options. The admin can choose whether it can be over ridden by users or not.