Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2303 readers

290 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WhoRoger@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Awa@lemmy.world

205

Woman who sued Texas for abortion left state to have procedure after ‘hellish’ week (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/health@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Center for the Reproductive Rights, which is representing Kate Cox, says she left after being ‘in and out of the emergency room’

The Texas woman who sued the state for an abortion after receiving a lethal fetal diagnosis has now fled Texas in order to obtain the procedure, the Center for Reproductive Rights announced in a statement Monday.

The woman, Kate Cox, a 31-year-old mother of two from Dallas, sued Texas last week. While a lower-court judge ruled to allow Cox to receive an abortion, the Texas state supreme court on Friday paused that ruling. In her lawsuit, Cox said that continuing the pregnancy could threaten her life and future fertility.

Texas bans almost all abortions. Although the ban technically includes exceptions for cases of medical emergencies, doctors have said that the exceptions are too vague and force them to wait until their patients get sick enough to intervene.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're just going to argue that they didn't deliberately restrict it, they paused it, because she wasn't in life-threatening danger YET.

Remember, the cruelty and suffering of women is the point, they get off on it.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Plus, they want this shit to go in front of the SC so they'll rule in favor of it.