Technology

60052 readers

3346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

1723

Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing" (pluralistic.net)

submitted 1 year ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

467 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We aren't talking about plagiarism, the friend would be telling the story about you still.

Spoken word narratives are such an integral part of culture, imagine if your grandpa told you to never repeat any of the stories of his childhood because "he owns the copywrite". Insane. That's what you are suggesting.

Ideas are not objects. Having good ideas shared incurs no loss to anybody, except imagined "lost potential value".

[–] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm saying that those who create are entitled to the value of what they create. If a company asks to look iver some of your work before hiring you, says that they aren't interested, and then you see them using that work afterwards i doubt you would be saying "well, information should be free".

If you want to write stories, draw pictures, make movies or webshows and distribute then for free ti everyone, then that's a noble initiative, but creatives depend on what they create for their livelyhood.

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

saying that those who create are entitled to the value of what they create.

Here I was thinking we all deserved a giant meteor.

The publisher example is one of a difference in power and you're saying that IP is there to protect the author. Except this whole video is about how that doesn't happen anymore. The law is written and litigated by those with power.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That happens already.

If the situation is reversed, the hammer comes down on the independent artist.

We need stronger worker and consumer protections. Copywrite is a shit solution.