this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16681 readers
611 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
62
US FTC tries again to stop Microsoft's already-closed deal for Activision (www.reuters.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

in what way is buying a competitor not inherently anti-competitive?

If someone has a history of anti-competitive behavior, preventing them from buying competitors is perfectly logical

[โ€“] EnderofGames@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

In the entertainment industry, there are not a lot of real competitors, if any.

I can't think of any scenario where Microsoft makes something, and any reasonable human would think "well, it's too bad Activision Blizzard isn't still making games on their own, it sure would have increased the quality of "