this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1005 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

44901 readers
3910 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OnopordumAcanthium@lemmy.ml 27 points 8 months ago (9 children)

It's expensive and has only the advantage of catching CO2, while trees have more than just that. Produces O2, Cooling the near surroundings, are a save heaven for many species and therefore increases biodiversity, filters the air and soil, also makes the soil more healthy and probably many other reasons.

Humans really are weird. Trying to replace a perfectly fine bio-machinery that developed over Thousands of years with their own steel junk. I dont see why anybody would prefer that gadget over a tree.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It’s expensive and has only the advantage of catching CO2

It doesn't even do that well. Algae have short lifespans and when they decompose, the CO2 will go right back into the atmosphere. It's the same reason you can't reasonably capture CO2 with small plants like grasses, nor does the carbon inside you count as captured. The reason trees "capture CO2" is because trees live for a long time and wood decomposes very slowly, and therefore keep its carbon locked in the wood for a long time. The point of capturing carbon is you take it out of circulation for as long as possible.

There are ways to have algae capture carbon, but they are fairly involved (read: very expensive) processes whose scalability is still uncertain. Certainly not a tank in the street.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was always under the impression that plants chemically convert CO2 and some other stuff to glucose (C6-H12-O6), right? In that case, the algae would still help, wouldnt they?

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It helps if and only if the glucose stays as glucose and is not metabolized. Wood is a good application of this, as its cellulose fibers are made of glucose, in a form that is very stable and can stay locked away for a long time (especially if the tree is alive as it does not metabolize the glucose in its own wood and has anti-predation adaptations that actively guard it against other organisms). However, if the glucose decomposes, i.e. is metabolized, it is converted either directly to CO2 or into other compounds that eventually end up as CO2, essentially returning the captured carbon back to the atmosphere.

load more comments (6 replies)