this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
9 points (60.5% liked)

Privacy

30829 readers
2695 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My main browser is Librewolf but I keep a chromium browser just in case. Previously used brave but their flatpak is shit. Ungoogled chromium seems ok but it looks like they don't change much from upstream chromium. Any good chromium browsers which harden their browsers like librewolf does for more privacy?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I use hardened Chrome with a lot of flags/features disabled and some privacy extensions. It's good enough for me.

[–] spez@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

What's so funny?

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Chrome or Chromium? Because that "hardening" is only the switches they allow you to use, so if its full of proprietary tracking software it is not hardened at all

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Chrome. I know that might be hard to believe but the switches work. You can absolutely stop Google from prefetching their usual services. Plus I don't login with a Google account on the browser, that makes a huge difference.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not use Chromium then? Give it a try?

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There really isn't much difference. I used Ungoogled-chromium before now. I use Chrome for selfish reasons. The flatpak for it(dev version) is auto updated with no human input required so I get fixes and security patches earlier and I kinda like that release.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just so you know, Chromium Browsers are more secure if you use the native package. But just for privacy reasons I would not run Chrome unrestricted in my system.

Automatic system updates work great.

https://github.com/trytomakeyouprivate/braveinstall-fedora-atomic

Also great Browser, not sure about how early releases come I use Beta

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Chromium Browsers are more secure if you use the native package.

This conclusion is relative for everyone as we all have different security needs. Plus there's no easier, better supported way to sandbox Chrome on Linux other than using Flatpak's permission model.

It's also ironic for you to be speaking about security when you are installing/updating your browser using random curl bash scripts.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

You havent looked at the repo. And we are talking about different sandboxes here.

The browsers sandbox websites, this is broken if the entire browser is sandboxed as you need to remove that capability to do so.

My bash script pulls in the official brave repo and gpg key, fix the access permissions and that is it. Brave has no documentation on how to use their repo without dnf so this is needed.

The repo has gpg verification enabled and the system will update the browser.

Please dont spread misinformation if you havent even looked at the "random bash script" that does not handle the updatingô