this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
208 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

33640 readers
216 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI singer-songwriter 'Anna Indiana' debuted her first single 'Betrayed by this Town' on X, formerly Twitter—and listeners were not too impressed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

That's pretty amazing.

The song sucks, but here was the cutting edge of AI music just seven years ago.

That it's gone from some nightmarish fever dream mashup to wannabe pop influencer levels of quality in less than a decade is pretty crazy, and as long as there isn't a plateau in the next seven years we'll probably be in a world where AI generated musical artists have a popular enough following that they will have successful holographic concert performances by 2030.

I over and over see people making the mistake of evaluating the future of AI based on the present state while ignoring the rate of change between the past and present.

Yeah, most of your experiences of AI in various use cases is mediocre right now. But what we have today in most areas of AI was literally thought to be impossible or very far out just a number of years ago. The fact you have any direct experiences of AI in the early 2020s is fucking insane and beyond anyone's expectations a decade earlier. And the rate of continued improvement is staggering. Probably the fastest moving field I've ever witnessed.

[–] Bighappee@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Call me crazy but I absolutely preferred the fever dream mashup that you posted.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Well, the Beatles and Beach boys are better than emo YouTube influencers as a genre.

But the quality of the production of the fever dream is dramatically worse.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Technically we already have things like Vocaloid, which aren't AI yet, but do have their own holographic concerts that are popular in places like Japan and China. So having an AI artist come on stage and sing be too farfetched for me, despite the fact I'd hate it because it's a soulless entity devised by the corporate fascists. As for the quality of AI generated songs, no clue, but I can totally see them just ripping off up and coming human artists and then sending cease and desist letters to them for "StEaLiNg Ai GeNeRaTeD mUsIc" that was originally stolen or just stealing popular vocaloid songs and piggybacking off of every single person they can for profit.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A useful razor for the near future:

Copyright exists to encourage human creativity.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Copyright originally existed for this reason. It no longer exists for this reason, and hasn't for a long time.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

here

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Keep in mind, though, AI progress is often more like punctuated equilibrium.

Each new approach gets you much further, and polishing each approach gets you slight improvements until the next approach comes along. Improvements to chatgpt might plateau until the next big breakthrough architecture. Or maybe not.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

polishing each approach gets you slight improvements

Without the base model changing at all, research into better use of the models has, depending on the measurement, gone from around 35% success rates to 85% success rates.

I wouldn't define that as slight.

[–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Blue Jeans and Bloody Tears was the best AI song ever.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Hold up. This sounds WAY better!

Is my opinion wrong?