this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
572 points (90.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21238 readers
1254 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    this is just a meme, I know that everyone is different and not all GNOME or KDE users are like that!!

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] ugh@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I use KDE plasma because I'm new to Linux but also want something minimal system-wise. I love the programs and the interface. Maybe my opinion would be different if I spent more time with other DE's or used it as my daily driver, but I'm sold on it now.

    GNOME is definitely more user-friendly for someone who is moving over from Windows/Mac. I wouldn't recommend KDE to someone who is just going to stick to using one-click apps.

    [–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

    I don't understand.

    The lack of even the most basic customisation of Gnome ia mind-blowing to me. Why do i need to install a gnome shell extension for even the most basic functionality that even MacOs has!?

    [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Kde is minimal now? Doesn't it require a GPU? Aren't there animations?

    I remember trying it out a few years back on my laptop from 2012 and it was unusably slow. Like 10 seconds just to open the menu.

    Xfce ran just fine though. That's a minimal DE.

    [–] prunerye@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

    Needing a GPU might be hyperbole, but no, it'll still be slow on older hardware. It looks lightweight on neofetch since, at rest, the RAM will appear as low as XFCE's, but it's not nearly as snappy.

    [–] ugh@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

    It's all relative. Ubuntu desktop is minimal compared to Windows, and I've found KDE to run much better than default Ubuntu. It's lightweight for how much it offers.

    [–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Actually I tried out KDE Plasma on my grandmother's budget laptop from about the same time. It was a little too slow with default settings, but once I killed the animations (can be done in Settings app) it ran pretty well. It ran a whole hell of a lot better than the Windows it came with.

    I also tested KDE vs XFCE in my old gaming computer, and I actually managed to get slightly less RAM usage in KDE than XFCE, so long as no plugins were used.

    Both systems were tested with Debian 12. On the gaming PC, I actually used the XFCE iso, so it was installed first.

    So depending on how your distro ships the default KDE Plasma settings or how you set it up, it actually can be a lightweight option compared with XFCE.