this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
95 points (94.4% liked)

Selfhosted

38773 readers
417 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I know this topic has been talked about 70 thousand times but I’m still not sure.

I have home server on an intel NUC behind the ISP router. On it I have the standard arr apps, jellyfin, pi-hole etc etc. I would like to access them through a domain rather than an IP. So I set them up in docker, behind traefik, behind authelia and behind cloudflare. I am the only one that uses it.

Now, I’m worried about the security of it all. I’ve been searching here and there and I’ve read about cf tunnels, wireguard server, vps, vlan, OPNsense etc etc. I still don’t know what would be the most secure. Should I just stay with what I have?

EDIT: I'm not behind CGNAT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why so complicated? Why not just SSH? Put it on some random port, make it public key login only, and you're done.

[–] ExploratrixLunae@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've beeb looking into a similar setup and I didn't know SSH could do this kind of tunneling. Thanks for the tip! I'm going to consider using it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

I'm not sure what you mean by tunnel, but SSH allows a "secure shell" aka an encrypted connection to a shell on a device. Tailscale, Headscale, and others are VPNs, which means they allow making it seem as if your computer is in the same (private) network as that of the server - but in order to have a shell on the server, you'll still need SSH.

To my knowledge, adding a VPN to open a secure shell on the server is unnecessary and has no security benefits.

[–] Eris@l.os33.co 1 points 8 months ago

This is what I do and I've wondered why people always shill for tailscale or cloud flare tunneling, seems like way too much extra bs for the same thing