this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
492 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59108 readers
3251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine a world when instead of

adding DWORD value of 32bit lenght named AllowCortana with value 0 to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Search in registry editor,

we could do "sudo dnf remove cortana".

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

we could do “sudo dnf remove cortana”.

Remove-AppxPackage in Powershell

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you need to use the command line on Windows afterall?

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Remote Powershell is like the only way I interact with Windows.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For me it's deleting the Windows partition and then installing Linux. That's just me though.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh you mean for personal use... I manage a mixed environment with about a thousand Windows workstations and 300 Windows Servers, about the same amount of Linux servers.

At home I only run Windows for Ableton Live cause VST plugins don't work on Linux :(.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, at my last job we were a 100% Microsoft free company. And at my current company I got the company to implement a policy to allow Mac and Linux workstations. I've managed thousands of Windows systems and server before also. I don't miss it.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a lot of our core tools don't have supported linux client software, SCADA clients and power flow/transmission grid simulation etc, but we also aren't a business so it's more about what gets the job done since we're basically mandated to do what we do.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's a perfect application for VMs. But either way, both Windows and Linux are just tools. For what I do, Linux is a better fit 95% of the time, and the last 5% I find alternative solutions. I don't want to be bothered to maintain another OS for some edge cases when I can get by with alternatives. The only thing I use Windows for right now (personally or professionally) is BlueIris, and even that is really wearing thin. Both the Windows OS is causing issues and BlueIris is just... bad.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We run virtual workstations and terminal servers for specific purposes, but a lot of our decisions are guided by NERC CIP standards and where certain things fall within that framework. The Windows workstations are probably the easiest part of this whole environment to manage though. It's realtime data and all the applications linked to that where the complicated stuff is. If it was up to me we'd be a Kubernetes shop.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

a lot of our decisions are guided by NERC CIP standards and where certain things fall within that framework.

I would hazard a guess that this is more of a "safe-bet" thing rather than a hard policy. I tried looking up anything that stipulates using Windows over any other OSes, and this Software Integrity and Authenticity is the only thing I could find with a five minute search.

Microsoft Windows provides such a mechanism for Microsoft signed software through its default configuration and through a Group Policy Object (GPO) that expands this capability to other trusted third parties.

It doesn't make sense that you wouldn't be able to use Linux, unless the higher-ups making the decisions are your classic dinosaurs that still believe Microsoft's propaganda from the 2000's about the scary "communist" Linux OS and the dangerous open-source programs that will steal your company secrets.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Nah it's because some core apps are not supported by the vendors on non-Windows OSs and adding an extra layer just to run Windows apps virtually/remotely when we could run them on workstations is unnecessary.