Selfhosted

39226 readers

483 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

some questions/ virt-manager/ proxmox/ debian (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ULS@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am going to redo my server from scratch. I installed virt-manager hoping to build it in there and keep setup guide/notes for myself for when i move it to the server pc.

Im not fluent in linux speak so bare with me.

Does anyone know how I can reach the proxmox IP when its in a vm set up with virt-manager? I installed it with the default network adapter setting and it gave me 10.0.2.15 for the ip. I couldnt reach it from the main system or a debian vm. I deleted both the proxmox and debian vm's and will try again. Should I be using a different network mode in virt-manager? is it even possible to do what im trying to do?

I want to try out using proxmox with a debian vm instead of baremetal omv for docker. I was also thinking about using a VM of omv for my storage drives.

anyone have input on this stuff? I saw docker has a desktop app that seems pretty good so I was going to try that. Or would it be better to just install debian without a DE and use docker from the command line?

should i just use debian for the drive shares too? should i stick with smb?

does it even make sense for me to use proxmox? I figured it would be easier for me (personally) to keep things backed up. I like the idea of being able to create new vm's to experiment with without breaking my main/only server.

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unfortunately Proxmox doesn't use libvirtd, so Virt-Manager doesn't interact with it. It's designed entirely around using the web interface.

Your options here are to either stick with Proxmox without Virt-Manager, or use straight KVM. If you want a web interface for KVM, there's Cockpit, which is pretty decent for most basic tasks, but definitely a little lacking in advanced features, so you'll end up going to Virt-Manager for stuff like modifying virtual hardware. I think you can also use OpenStack as a web interface, but I've never played around with it myself.

Honestly, if you're a little newer to Linux I would probably stick with Proxmox, as it's a very well designed purpose built hypervisor.

For Docker, you'll want to deploy a VM and then setup Docker within the VM. Never run Docker from your hypervisor, it likes to fuck with IPtables in ways that break VM networking.