Technology

58925 readers

3610 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

595

Judge finds evidence that Tesla, Musk knew about Autopilot defect (www.reuters.com)

submitted 11 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Florida judge found "reasonable evidence" that Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk and other managers knew the automaker's vehicles had a defective Autopilot system but still allowed the cars to be driven unsafely, according to a ruling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know if that's the reasoning that will hold up in court. Would a judge say a 1 in a billion chance is "extremely likely? That reasoning would apply to all cars in general wouldn't it? Driving is potentially dangerous no matter what car you drive. People are guaranteed to die in car accidents everyday just by sheer volume and that would be true if Tesla didn't exist.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not apologizing for them. I'm just dubious of getting a conviction.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not that people die crashing them, or even that a manufacturing/software defect causes the deaths.

It's that Tesla knew that there was a software error that would almost certainly cause somebody to die, and intentionally chose not to address the issues for financial reasons. That's textbook depraved indifference.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that cost of a recall calculation scene from Fight Club.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And that's exactly why the depraved indifference rule exists.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are there any famous examples of that being used?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Schlitterbahn waterpark is a fairly recent high-profile example.

The designers of the water coaster and co-owner of the park were charged with murder because they knew the ride was lethally dangerous and kept it running.

In fact, they'd paid off people hurt in other near-death accidents to keep quiet.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the example! I'll definitely check that out.