this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
44 points (95.8% liked)

Privacy

31424 readers
909 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I like to try websites out before tying my identity to them. How do you do it? Simplelogin? I honestly won't manually make a new gmail for every new website I try and I to want the option to see what emails I get.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd never use a temp email when I'm paying, considering they have my CC info. For random accounts that I won't check the mail accounts of, temp is great. Not going to trust a company for this.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Those addresses are there until you delete them. What does them having your CC have to do with it? Better yet, why do they have a CC? Meaning a real one? Not a masked one? Fuck that!

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, you'd use Privacy.com? Decent idea I suppose.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its (incredibly) rare for me to use a card online if it's not privacy. I also used them constantly in real life thanks to places that have apps that let you add CC's. My gym, Supermarket, Gas at Kroger, Car wash, etc.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Do you pay for the premium tier? I would like a decent credit score, and using my card for normal, everyday purchases doesn't bother me as much.

Edit: Well, technically, they have your data anyway. It's like using Paypal for everything. TBH I'm OK with the system as it is right now, but I'd like greater adoption for Monero so I can make purchases directly using that instead of converting it to fiat once again.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I joined before it all changed and the only difference was how many card a month you can make. Currently, I believe they push the real transaction info to your bank so they'll show normally on your bank statements, where mine just say privacy.com, as well as the browser addon and web app, which are are all now a paid feature.

That said though, the $10/mo is worth it for what you get in the end. My whole purchasing life would change without it.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they are going to push the transaction to my bank anyway, I'm definitely not trying it. As I said, even PayPal will obscure the buyer's details from the seller. What's the point?

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only on the free plan, but verify that. Even if you did do it on the free plan it's still very much worth it. You still have the protection of different cards for different people, the fact they lock to who you use them with, the ability to set spending limits, burner cards that only work once, the ability to pause or delete cards at will etc. All of that is a huge win either way, even if the transaction info goes to the bank. But even then that's an option.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would be OK doing that if they didn't link to my debit card in the free plan (last time I checked)

[–] random65837@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How would expect them to do it? I can't see how they wouldn't link to you card if you expect to spend money. Moneys got to come from somewhere. Auth tokens are the safest way of doing that, prior to them upgrading to that it was done through ACH, which is not only slow, it's much more dangerous for the user since they have actual checking acct info. Auth tokens don't work that way, and even if there was a breach, your checking acct info isn't there, only a token they can't use. The way they're doing it is the smartest way for both speed, and your acct safety.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They link to one's credit card in the premium plan. That's what I would have wanted to see becoming universal in their services, but unfortunately that's behind a paywall

[–] random65837@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha, so you mean actual (credit) as a funding source vs debit? Can you link that? I didn't see that in the comparison, I'd possibly consider that.

I can do that now with Capital One, but having that all together would be nice. Kinda surprising, I'd think those habitual wrongful charge back types would wreck that for everybody.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

My apologies, I thought privacy.com supported credit cards, but apparently they don't, even in the premium tier. Indeed, I would like virtual cards for my credit card, since I'm never going to buy anything with my debit card anyway. I wish the other banks had something like Capital One