Technology

58092 readers

3147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1335

‘Energy independent’ Uruguay runs on 100% renewables for four straight months (theprogressplaybook.com)

submitted 10 months ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"with wind the single-biggest contributor.... Power production costs have declined “by almost half” .... And the clean energy sector has created 50,000 new jobs.... Ask me what was the impact on the electricity sector in Uruguay after this tragic war in Europe — zero."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jesta@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Hydropower provides a large percentage of installed production capacity in Uruguay, almost all of it produced by four hydroelectric facilities, three on the Rio Negro and one, the Salto Grande dam shared with Argentina, on the Uruguay River. The production from these hydropower sources is dependent on seasonal rainfall patterns, but under normal hydrological conditions, can supply off-peak domestic demand." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Uruguay

[–] mihies@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And they burn fossil fuels if necessary or import from Brazil it seems. They would have problems if a season is dry though.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They haven't for four months though, which is what the actual article is about. You're all over the thread throwing around negativity about the least optimal conditions.

Are you not keen to see how long they can do this for? If they achieve this for 11 out of 12 months of the year for the next decade, is that not a huge win for them and for our ambitions around the globe?

[–] mihies@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is usually not 4 good months but the time when you don't have renewables since the demand is still there, or even higher (during winter). And then you have problems (see Germany, which is currently the biggest polluter around because of their renewables policy). They are lucky that they have majority of energy coming from hydro, since that is quite reliable, but still, what happens if drought strikes? Not an impossible scenario in these times of global warming. How much fossil fuels are they burning yearly instead of running a nuclear power plant?
I'd be more than happy if renewables did solve all problems, but I don't see how can that work today.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I see what you're saying but the only tangible reply is: perfection is the enemy of good.

If we get to a point where half the world is doing this while falling back to fossil in emergencies, while the other half has a 100% success rate with nuclear, then the case is clear.

But that's not where we are and this, on its own terms, is a step away from fossil fuels as a primary solution, which is progress.