Asklemmy

44151 readers

1317 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

216

Americans of Lemmy, what is your approach to next year's election? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by Jordan_Jordan@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

402 comments fedilink hide all child comments

2020 was... truly unique. It was so hard to stay away from doom scrolling, and I (and many others) were pretty disillusioned by the sad fact that so much of our country legitimately supported the Orange Man. I didn't get a wink of sleep the night of the election because I genuinely considered it to be a make or break decision for America.

My point is that looking back on it, in the end the only real difference I made was at the ballet box. This year I'm going for the Head-in-the-Sand approach. I'm done with the political memes. Done with the Twitter screenshots. It just riles me up and this year I'm gonna do my best to fight that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Choosing between only two options is not freedom by any means.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's why we have primaries. People's inability to understand the importance of primaries simultaneously means they don't vote in them and hate the results. (On average)

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The primaries are just a smoke screen. You want to get rid of all the shitty parts of the US voting system? Get rid of the Electoral College. Get rid of the First-Past-the-Post voting system we have been shackled to and all the issues disappear.

CGP Gray did a great series of videos in YouTube like a decade ago about our voting system, alternatives, and how many issues are created from just the Electoral College alone. Unfortunately, those elected stand to lose the most if the process changed so it never will.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

CGP Grey didn't cover primaries.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't the democrat party say they wouldn't allow primary debates this election, because Biden was the clear winner?

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think that's dumb but debates aren't inherently required for elections.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are not required, but it doesn't sound like a free democracy, if there's no debate.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Are any of these debates really debates?