this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
201 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
2851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

there are seroius longevity concerns with Lithium batteries. if you just fill the car up with combustible gas, there's no battery that is expensive to replace every 10-20 years. australia could very well be one of the best countries tp deploy this technology.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Hydrogen tank for the Toyota Mirai literally has a replacement date of 10 years. And that's not a maybe, it has to be replaced for safety reasons.

Modern Batteries last 10 years easy. Even the abused leaf ones with no thermal management last fine. It will not be any issue

[–] mihies@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could be, but I bet that hydrogen tanks is much cheaper, easier to produce and recycle. Also doesn't require rare earth materials.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not comparable at all, I just said it as a reaction. The battery is more comparable to how often an engine completely dies. It doesn't, really. Especially the newer ones with proper thermal management.

The tank is cheaper, sure. But the hydrogen itself and infrastructure isn't, and hydrogen isn't even really green 95% of the time. But that's a whole different topic.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How is solar hydrogen collection stations that pull hydrogen out of the atmosphere not green?

[–] ours@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's wasting solar that could be used for better things.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

But without the loss of solar to hydrogen convertion.

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I imagine the next Mad Max movie with hydrogen cars. Invisible fires and awesome explosions sounds like a match made in heaven...

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] frathiemann@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

These concers exist for Hydrogen too. While the Hydrogen tanks can last a longe time, the catalyst in the Fuel cell degrades, like the electrodes of batteries do. That means that the fuel cell needs to be replaced as well after some time. In addtition to that, fuel cell vehicles need batteries as well, since the fuel cell is slow to respond to load changes. These smaller batteries are stressed heavily in stop and go traffic and will need to be replaced a lot more often than Ev batteries.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

I think they are talking about using hydrogen as the fuel for an internal combustion engine, not fuel cells

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

This isn't a fuel cell. It's an ICE motor.

This is why Toyota and other manufacturers are still working on hydrogen. The ICE motor to run these is pretty much the same as current petroleum based ICE motors. Until batteries can charge in 5mins and travel more than 100 miles under load, then hydrogen is the way.