this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
674 points (94.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
902 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I use plasma, BTW

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Is it difficult to replace systemd?

    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Borderline impossible if you aren't using a distro designed with that in mind. Pretty much everything that isn't a program you directly start (e.g. sound system, desktop environment, bluetooth daemon etc.) either only provide a systemd unit to start them (which you'll have to manually translate into e.g. a shell script if you want it to work with your new init system) or is entirely reliant on systemd to function.

    Your choices of distro if you don't want systemd are Debian, Void, Artix, and Gentoo, and afaik that's about it.

    Replacing components of the systemd suite (e.g. using connman or networkmanager instead of systemd-networkd) isn't actually that bad as long as your DE has support for them, but replacing systemd itself is something you are building your entire system around.

    [–] pascal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Your choices of distro if you don’t want systemd are Debian, Void, Artix, and Gentoo, and afaik that’s about it.

    IIRC Debian was one of the first distros implementing systemd.

    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

    It still leaves sysvinit as an option. Debian doesn't lock you into systemd. Heck, it doesn't even lock you into Linux -- you can use Debian on top of the FreeBSD kernel if you so desire

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

    Extremely. When things like your DE starts being dependent on systemd, you don't want to replace it.

    I had posted about the monopoly that systemd has, and was down voted to oblivion.