this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
289 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

16740 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Neon and Argon: Seem okay. They're really quite similar though. It's like the designers couldn't decide which they liked more and so just decided to release both.

Xenon: It feels alright. The horizontal serifs give everything a more uniform look, but you can also get that with any other serif font.

Radon: Uh, no thanks. It's like someone took the weird letters from Dank Mono and said "what if we did that but for the whole font?"

Krypton: What if we just took OCR A and added ligatures? Alternatively, "Floating Point Precision Error: The Font"

Overall, none of these are compelling enough to make me want to try them. I quite like the Texture Healing feature, but it's not enough to make me want to move to it.

Also, using multiple different fonts in one code file sounds horrendous.

[–] suy@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Radon, the "handwriting" one, seems like if someone wanted to have Comic Sans but for code.

[–] cashew@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Comic Code is a thing and it's 10/10. It's proof that handwriting style fonts for code is possible.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)