this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
119 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

47337 readers
1071 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
119
Why btrfs gets huge perf hit with background IO work? (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by Alawami@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's not btrfs that's slow, it's bcachefs that's insanely fast. Bcachefs almost as fast as ext4 while having that many features is insane.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This screenshot is the only metric where btrfs is incredibly slow.

Bcachefs random and sequential writes and reads are much slower than other filesystems in this benchmark.

I have no idea how the actual real world performance will be. Bcachefs still misses a lot of features so I'll continue to follow the development, hopefully including performance improvements.

Bcachefs sequential write performance in this out-of-the-box comparison was coming in at around half the speed of Btrfs while XFS, F2FS, and EXT4 were the fastest.

https://www.phoronix.com/review/bcachefs-linux-67/2

Edit: The benchmarks were done with a debug variable set, which explains the weak IO.

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Bcachefs-Updated-Linux-6.7

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, so the benchmarks mostly contradict claims that bcachefs is almost as fast as ext4 except in application startup time? What kind of test performed for that application startup time benchmark?

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Note that in this benchmark, bcachefs had a debug variable turned on that allegedly severely hampered performance. Bcachefs has released an update to disable this variable but Phoronix hasn't redone benchmarks yet. I wouldn't put much value into any bcachefs-related comparisons from this current benchmark.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

Interesting, that hopefully explains the weak IO troughput. Thank you.

[–] ProtonBadger@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The application startup test is designed to cold-load an application with heavy background IO going on.