this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
68 points (92.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53411 readers
652 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I dream of a program suite like [Overseer+Jacket+Sonaar+Plex] which would search, download and organize a video game library.

Does one already exist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thantik@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Then why not a zip/rar/7z/tar.gz file instead? There's no reason for it to be an executable.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe any of the commission methods you listed provide the same amount of compression as the tools used by some repackers.

I'm no expert. I believe UltraArc/FreeArc are what's used to get things down so small, and as far as decompressing goes I don't think support for those compression methods is baked in to your OS/WinRar/7zip etc.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Windows supports every single one of those compression methods that I just listed with maybe the exception of tar.gz -- so it's asinine that they package this way. You're just training idiots to pointlessly run .exe files on piracy sites - likely so in the future, when someone wants to - they release a popular game with their packaged EXE and throw everyone into a botnet.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/windows-11-adds-support-for-11-file-archives-including-7-zip-and-rar/

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstood two separate thoughts.

  1. Your listed compression methods are not as high compression as what some repackers use.
  2. The compression algorithm used by some repackers is not supported by OS's or many common archiving software.
[–] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
  1. You're wrong.
  2. Moot point, because of point #1 being wrong.

The compression differences between arc and others are insignificant. On the orders of maybe 10's of megabytes. They are not making custom packagers, etc just to save 10 megabytes on a 7gb ROM.

[–] deur@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You are a fucking dumbass, please just shut the fuck up. Don't download the repacks then, dipshit. The higher compression ratio is valuable for SEEDING, you know, the thing you should be doing with the torrents you consume. It also is nice to have a shorter download.

Also its clear the entire unpacking process is designed to be idiot proof. Hence the exe.