this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
458 points (94.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court's decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even more than the outright bigotry, what concerns me most is this growing trend of conservative ideology that allows for lawsuits without cause. You shouldn't be able to sue unless you are harmed. That's the way its supposed to work. Yet these conservative courts have been turning that concept entirely on its head lately.

[–] cricket98@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Um that's not true at all. You are absolutely allowed to challenge the precedence of laws even if you have been yet to be directly affected.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's something completely different. You can tell by your use of the word "yet".

[–] cricket98@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is that "completely different"

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did you use the word "yet"?

[–] cricket98@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because you are allowed to challenge laws even if they have yet to affect your life

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, why are you using the word yet? Think about it. When you have you'll understand the difference.

[–] cricket98@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

? All I'm saying is that immediate harm is not required for a lawsuit. I know you think you're being smart but you're overanalyzing what I said for no reason.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No, not at all. Immediate harm was never the criteria we were discussing. It was any harm. It's always been legal to argue that you have a reasonable suspicion that a law will affect you personally. Even if it has yet to do so. That can be argued in a court of law. That is not what I'm objecting to at all

What I'm objecting to is the current practice in conservative legal thought process where you can sue when you have no reasonable expectation that it will affect you personally. We've seen that all over conservative legal arguments lately.