this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
213 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
6838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
213
AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content (www.theverge.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content::The companies building generative AI tools like ChatGPT say updated copyright laws could interfere with their ability to train capable AI models. Here are comments from OpenAI, StabilityAI, Meta, Google, Microsoft and more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bored_runaway@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But isn't the intent and not the scale that makes it illegal? Scale only evidence for the intent.

[โ€“] lollow88@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I see what you mean. Perhaps cold calling would be a better example then, where it is illegal if it is automated.