this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
91 points (92.5% liked)

Linux

48003 readers
1041 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
91
What's the difference between package manager and why are there so many? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Are they so different that it's justified to have so many different distributions? So far I guess that different package manager are the reason that divides the linux community. One may be on KDE and one on GNOME but they can use each other's packages but usually you are bound to one manager

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drito@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Some differences can be explained. Pacman was created after the Debian package manager (I guess that because Debian is older than Arch) . It is justified because Pacman is faster than Apt. But its too much work to replace Apt by Pacman comparing to the benefits.

But in some cases I don't know why. As instance I wonder why a distro, such as Void, created its own package manager instead of using the Alpine one. If Alpine is younger than Void, invert the sentence of course.

[–] khorovodoved@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Void was created just for testing xbps. Without xbps there would be no Void.

[–] mrbaby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've yet to play with void. Is there anything cool/special about xbps?

[–] khorovodoved@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is extremely fast and simple. Also, it has its own "aur", called xbps-src. But nowadays void is not just xbps, it is also defined by runit (which is also extremely fast and simple) and minimalist dependencies (you will have to manually install many things, that other distributions ship reinstalled, in case you need them. By the way, if you prefer GUI package manager, there is octoxbps (not an advantage of xbps, but you might want that when you try void linux).

[–] mrbaby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nice! I'm coming from arch with systemd so it'll be interesting to play around with runit too. Definitely going to give it a tinker.

Thanks for the info!