this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1322 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
4435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The pirates are back - Anew study from the European Union’s Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) suggest that online piracy has increased for the first time in years. In fact, piracy rates have bee...::We analyze a new study where the EUIPO suggests online piracy is on the increase within the European Union.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi 185 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The article wonders why would anyone pirate, let us give him the reason:

  1. Ads
  2. Multiple streaming services costing many times more than food. With nothing to see except for re runs and rehashes of old content.
  3. Ads
  4. Rising prices for poor service and shit content.
  5. Ads
  6. Geoblocking
  7. Ads
  8. Low quality videos even if you are willing to pay just because you don't wish to use their specified player or browser. Why can't I stream it to VLC player without the overhead of a browser.
  9. Ads
  10. All the while the CEO and the executive of the companies raking in billions on the money they are saying charging us for the artists.
[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Ads
  2. Low Video Quality because you don't want to install Windows
[–] ours@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Forcing me to buy a new TV because my current one is suddenly an "unsupported device".
  2. Not allowing me to watch Netflix in my summer house because they're "cracking down on sharing accounts".
[–] ours@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is 14 really a thing? Or are you talking about having to buy a new smart device that may or may not be included in your TV and that in any case can be replaced but a separate device?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep. Very much. Translated to English it says "Netflix is no longer supported on this device. Visit netflix.com/compatibledevices for a list of supported devices".

This is when hitting the netflix button on the tv remote. Worked until a few days ago.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd chuck that up more to "smart TVs are trash".

They have crappy processing power and TV makers support them for the shortest of timespans. I've solved that but turning my smart TV into a dumb screen and an NVidia Shield TV as its brains (NVidia has so far been exemplary in supporting Shield TVs).

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't disagree that smart TVs are trash, but this wasn't the TV not keeping up, this was netflix deciding that I couldn't use it anymore.

I give them money, why are they making it hard for me to use their product.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These major corps are pulling some absolute bullshit all the time with this kind of stuff. People are frustrated with the rich in general, but I think they don't even comprehend the amount of fuckery that is pulled on us all.

One example, I have an android phone from 2017 that still works great. Luckily the company that made it doesn't go hard on planned obsolescence seemingly, but I was curious about replacing it, and new comparable phones are more expensive than mine was, have more bloatware preloaded, and lower specs to top it off. To be fair though they do have incredible new cameras.

[–] Isycius@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It is likely due to: they want to update their software to add new features, but these device doesn't have enough power to support that or it takes far too much human resource to implement, so most logical answer is they drop it. As for what kind of feature they add that would make it so difficult to implement...

In this brave new world of companies, more ways to serve ads and new method to mine telemetry data seems to count as a feature.

[–] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Vendors should be entitled to withdraw support on particular hardware, but they shouldn't be allowed to brick the service as a result 'just because'. All it needs is a TOS/EULA update prompt advising that viewers with X hardware are on their own as of now. I'd be willing to bet this denial of service practice originates in kickback discussions between TV manufacturers and streamers.

It strikes me as another case where corporate can inculcate learned helplessness in the customer by having him think disallowing and withdrawing support for are indivisible.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 9 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't mind using proprietary apps if they weren't so fucking horrible to use.

Goddammit, if you're going to force me to install your shitty program just because I want to watch a show you own the license to, at least put a semblance of effort into the UI...

[–] reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I forgot to add

  1. Removing content when it is not making enough money.
  2. Ads
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Editing exsting content with no warning or notice (for whatever reason- political correctness or losing the soundtrack license doesn't matter why)
  2. Ads.
[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also wanna add:

  1. Missing subtitles in the language you want (looking at you apple tv without English subtitles on local language movies.)
  2. Ads
  3. Only the 2 random seasons in the middle of a TV show are available. And new seasons not added.
  4. Ads
[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As a person who loves watching movies with subtitles, this is why I'm canceling Amazon Prime. The fuckers literally won't offer me English language subtitles for some flicks because I Iive outside the US.

I don't care if the movie itself is in English, why the hell can't I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

[–] GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

why the hell can't I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

Probably because the subtitles have their own copyright separate from the film itself and Amazon likely doesn't have the license to the English subtitles outside of the USA. It wouldn't surprise me, music lyrics have their own separate copyright from the recording after all.

The copyright system is the biggest problem here. It simply isn't fit for purpose in the digital age, unless that purpose was to benefit a handful of legacy mega corps while harming independent content creators and stifling culture across the globe.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had no idea subtitles could be copyrighted separate from the film/media they're subtitling (but, it does make sense when you think about it).

I agree with you completely: the current US copyright system is a joke that serves little purpose (in today's media scape).

I wish it was just the US copyright system that's the problem, some nations have worse copyright laws. In France for example architecture can have copyright, and renovations have a separate copyright from the original architecture.. The lights on the Eiffel Tower have a separate copyright from the Eiffel Tower itself, which is currently in the public domain. So while it's completely fine to take a photo of the Tower during the day at night you need to have permission from the copyright holder, and they have taken action against people who have taken photos of the Tower at night.

Then there are some nations where there isn't even a public domain and stuff never loses their copyright.

Many of these worse laws have been driven by US and EU trade policies and Trade Agreements mandating draconian copyright and intellectual property laws.

Copyright laws are just a nightmare writ large.

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And rip watching a Christopher Nolan Movie without subtitles nowadays

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 6 points 1 year ago

Yep, exactly.

Fuck you - if I'm paying to watch, I should get the very basic of features. Piracy is literally a better user experience right now.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

And don't forget about the ads.

[–] sndrtj@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago
  1. Content that is pulled halfway through watching it.
[–] lloram239@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also everything is just streaming. You can't actually buy DRM-free movies (important for things like VR headsets or when without Internet), often you can't even buy anything at all, it's all just the library of the streaming service were content comes and goes at random.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

You will own nothing and you will like it!

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You forgot about stuff that just gets taken down one day.

Edit: oh you added it in a comment.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There are a few what I'll term magnet shows on each streaming service. They want you to pay for the service for the magnet shows and then stick around and watch other half-baked filler garbage or a seasons of a show they cancelled before giving them any hope of finishing their story arc.

Most streaming networks have abundant garbage content I'd never want to watch, knockoffs of other shows, and global content that's often of soap opera quality with subtitles.

They also (on purpose) often offer no way to filter to the things you want to see other than search, and search is often misleading or terrible too.

It's basically a race to the bottom just like Amazon. Junk programs created for pennies pretending to match your results.

The whole thing is a crap fest that's quickly becoming worse than the cable network structure it replaced.

No, thank you.

[–] Brutticus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you go through the front page, there is usually only 100 shows the platform is pushing, ad nauseam. Like the algorithm is maybe some shows it thinks youll like, or shows they want to astroturf. I would really like a way to go into the dregs, the shit, the stuff netflix thinks is at the bottom of my metrics. Granted, piracy doesn't do this either (lol how would that even work? I put everything on that server myself) but I would have considered keeping my subscription if they did.

[–] reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

True I start a new movie or a series but can't see it past a few minutes.