this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
89 points (98.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8250 readers
580 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's literally true of ALL action against the company, though... The devs don't have power to magically pay themselves more when the company sees a windfall. The execs do.

Saying, "this will hurt the devs" when attacking the company is worse than useless rhetoric that's simply wrong. It is NOT TRUE because it is not a unique attribute of this situation... They get fucked 24/7. Saying they'll get fucked more is basic fear mongering tripe.

[โ€“] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca -5 points 10 months ago

This isn't attacking the company though. It's attacking a single game and the company/publisher will just roll on through.