this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1038 points (90.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

30037 readers
300 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onfire@lemmy.world 180 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wiki was getting popular when I was in college over 10 years ago. I recall a history professor telling me not to use Wikipedia as source. I am like, okay, I will just use the source wiki uses, which are pretty solid in my opinion. Wiki came a long way.

[–] Neve8028@lemm.ee 96 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's important to remember that wikipedia, itself, isn't a source, it's a summary of different sources. It's a great resource to find sources and get an overview of a topic, though.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as you verify the source still exists. There are so many dead links on Wikipedia.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

Archive.org bots replace dead links with working alternatives a lot nowadays. All the more reason to support that modern museum

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please dig a little bit deeper. You may end up with a stack of links to 404 sites instead of actual sources. Just because you copied a citation from WP doesn’t mean the source actually exists, let alone contains the information you seek.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

In that case, try using an archived version of the webpage, for example at the Wayback Machine

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And it'll get even better. That being said, it's worth checking out the Talk pages on the articles you want to use, as they may contain information about what is (and isn't) displayed.

I started passively editing it and I've been incredibly impressed.