this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1179 points (98.9% liked)

Comic Strips

11758 readers
1408 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I love Yugioh so much but everytime I try to teach a friend about the game it just ends up like this. So sad.

MrLovenstein Source Links:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I always feel bad for TCG because the more you learn about them the less fun they are. I should be enjoying a variety of cards but instead I'm reducing the amount of luck and bad draws by just putting duplicates of every useful card to the max value I can

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

I used to play magic with my friends when I was in school and we made the mistake of actually going to the game shop and trying to play with people there. We all got demolished by the tryhard dudes there because we just made decks with cards we thought were cool and they all knew the meta gaming stuff. On top of that they were assholes about it. We never tried that again.

I did manage to win one game with a combo I had that allowed me to generate an infinite number of 1/1 tokens but that was sheer luck.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s pretty much all competitive games unfortunately.

“Join League of Legends and try its 165 Champions ~~of which only 40 max are worth playing at any given time~~!”

[–] ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’ll admit I never played that one, but it really doesn’t have “that handful of weapons/loadouts/whatever that are competitively viable and overshadow all the rest”?

[–] ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

It's different to competetive games mentioned here because a) at least like 70% of guns are competetively viable b) they are all meaningfully different and c) they allow for a wide array of different tactis that makes the game really fun to watch and play. Obviously there is a meta, but that meta changes and encompasses a lot of things.

[–] Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

You just have to memorize all of the maps, and the recoil patterns of each gun

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does the Negev see comparative use?

[–] GoosLife@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well not because its not competitively viable. It's just not meta right now, and it probably won't be for a while because there's a gentleman's agreement in pro play not to use it, similar to the autosniper, although the autosniper is also partially because it can be a really bad time to drop it into your opponents hands.

In regular matchmaking it's not too uncommon to see.

Of course, the meta is aks, m4s and deagles, but really, most weapons are compeititively viable, depending on the situation. The mp5 is criminally underrated. I wrote a reddit post during the Astralis era about how good dualies were on pistol rounds, and they've only just gone meta despite not having had any change to price or functionality. Same with the scoped rifles.

There's one weapon in CS that's not viable, and it's the m249. All the other ones can be used competitively.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I know, I was being a bit obtuse on propose. CS is pretty much gold standard of a value generating non-p2w successful competitive game.

However it does have some weapons that are considered non viable in comparative unless the balance changes or the meta does (krieg Fi).

It's just impossible to make a game that has a choice of strategies, in which every choice is as competitive as the other.

[–] ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Those weapons are in the minority though. The real problems only ever happen when valve tries to rebalance shit and accidentally make the game almost unplayable for several months.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's where casual commander and limited in MtG shine. In commander, no duplicates, and playing casual with known playgroups can let you just have fun with weird combinations of cards. And in limited you just have to play with what you open or draft, and try to make it work, which is a fun challenge.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Both great options I used to recommend. I'm sure you can try hard 100 card decks but I think at that point people are more willing to be annoyed at you for not having fun in such a format

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I'm sure you can try hard 100 card decks

That's called CEDH, and it is very competitive and toxic. That's why I specifically mentioned casual commander.