this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
368 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44156 readers
882 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, seems kind of scary that this implies a future where so many people are in prison that their vote could actually tip the balance ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Akasazh@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still don't explain why it's, in your opinion, necessary to remove voting rights.

You put that it they shouldn't remove those for small infractions, but that the administration can't decide on a line where voting restrictions should be put, and therefore just blanket bans every from from voting.

Also it's somehow ok that after people have finished their punishment, they should be punished some more by stripping them off even more rights.

All of that greatly reduces chances of rehabilitation and keeps criminals in the criminal sector. I fail to see why even minor infractions should lead to lifelong consequences.