this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
528 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3496 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gakomi@lemmy.world 167 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not gonna lie the fighting pedophilia seems more of an excuse in order to read our messages!

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The "fighting terrorism" argument didn't work, so this is their new angle.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

It worked, they just want even more access with less push back.

[–] TheWinged7@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Or the "fighting drugs" argument either

[–] Assdddffff@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is nothing new fighting pedophilia and human trafficking are the smokescreen used to enact most laws controlling the internet.

Edit to fill in what I’m implying: these laws (eg FOSTA-SESTA) are either ineffective or counterproductive in their stated goal, while simultaneously having broad add-on effects, generally harming free speech.

FOSTA-SESTA makes sex work less safe for those who are not trafficked. Meanwhile it pushes actual traffickers “underground” and off the internet, making it much harder for law enforcement to find and successfully prosecute them. Bonus: the law has been used to push sex education and general discussion of sex and sexuality off of major websites.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

These laws enable child abuse, not prevent it, by giving abusive authority figures greater ability to control and monitor their victims' communications.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

"For the children!" legislation has never been for the children, and always has been pushing authoritarian laws that take away peoples power.

and they feel safe doing it, because they have the in built system of shutting down criticism and complaint with "Oh, so you DON'T want to protect the childrens? You DON'T want to stop them being sexually exploited?!"

[–] maggio@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what a criminal would say! /s

[–] Gakomi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wrong cause I have no problem if anyone see my mesajes it just bothers me that they can spy on you. Frankly if someone sees my messages they will either laugh their ass off of be traumatize by my memes. They will probably consider me a misogin, racist and whatever due to my sens of humor and I will probably get called by suicide prevention services due to my depression!