this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
142 points (92.3% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

3 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Gargoyles reboot is officially on the way. Months after a report suggested Kenneth Branagh could be helming a live-action reboot of the cult classic animated series, a new trade report says a live-action series is, in fact, in development at Disney+. While it doesn't appear that Branagh is working on it, the series has a pair of monstrous names attached. Gary Dauberman has been hired to write, showrun, and executive produce the series alongside James Wan and his Atomic Monster banner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Huxleywaswrite@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Franchise was the word you're misusing, dumbass. I don't even care about the show. It could be literally be a reboot of anything, but it's not a fucking franchise. Words have meanings.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which I corrected when I clarified in my response. Yet your mong ass doubled down after being told that I meant intellectual property.

It could be a reboot of any IP and it would still be a hollow cash grab to exploit fandoms.

Words have meanings and you’re a fucking imbecile.