this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
1207 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Good. It's the same for me as regular businessee: if you can't make a profit while don't breaking the law, you shouldn't make business.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's already regular business, they aren't breaking any laws by running a channel and getting ad revenue...

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here are a couple argument why it shouldn't be legal:

  • Patreon: In the real world, you can't just give money to a business for nothing, there has to be some kind of value exchange. Patreon probably has some bullshit in their TOS that you're not actually donating, but buying some "perks", but that's not what a lot of youtuber's convey in their messages. To accept donations the "right" way, they would have to register a non-profit entity, then they'd have to publicly report exactly how much they received and spent, from where and on what. If they also do ads they'd have to also have a separate for-profit entity, and overall they'd have to be very careful with how they use the money as the non-profits can't just give money away either. None of the youtubers I've seen actually do this.

  • Ad integrations: It should definitely be against Youtube's TOS to have ads inside the video (and possible other sponsored deals), because most major channels can easily find their own funding, disable google's ads and use their infrastructure without paying squat. And if they don't, by doing advertisement themselves they're still Google's competitors, as you can't shove infinite amount of ads in a video - the viewer's patience is limited and they tend to either leave the platform or set up ad-blockers, both of which cut into Google's revenue. So what I meant by "charging creators" initially, was some kind of deal among the lines of "If your video reaches 100.000 views, you owe us $0.10 per 1000 views over that, unless your video has ads enabled and not demonetized" or something like that.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago
  1. You absolutely can give people money for nothing, and the receiver pays taxes on the amounts unless they fall under specific circumstances such as charity organization.

  2. You have to select that your video contains advertisements during the upload process. Failure can result in a channel strike, and three strikes can lead to channel deletion (which can result in a huge monetary loss for the channel owners).