this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
546 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

55715 readers
3007 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some Walmart employees say customers are getting hostile at self-checkout — and they blame anti-theft tech::When Walmart's anti-theft self-checkout tech alerts an employee of a missed scan, it can cause some uncomfortable situations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Those free plastic bags deteriorate into toxic materials that are presently all over the inside of your body. You had to wait in a slow line for people to bag the wrong things together and sometimes scan the same thing twice. Now I have my own canvas bags that last forever, I never scan my things twice, and my shit is bagged with the right things together based on where they go in my home.

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Switching from single use plastic to multi-use plastic has greatly increased carbon emissions of production. You also have to reuse the new plastic bags over 100 times for them to break even, emissions wise. (https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/04/30/plastic-paper-cotton-bags/)

I agree with you that canvas bags are better overall, but IMO we should move back to paper. It's WAY easier to reuse paper products, gardeners love the paper bags, and they break down quickly even if they are littered somewhere. There are some tradeoffs, such as transportation costs being higher because they are thicker than single use bags, but if you compare paper to multi-use bags, it's a fairly moot point.

Also, I'd still rather someone bag my shit for me. I've had so many things broken or otherwise damaged by the cashier haphazardly tossing my stuff into the cart just so I can walk 5 foot and take 10 minutes to pack my own stuff. Personal preference, but it should be given as an option imo.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Multi use plastic bags are a moronic half measure agreed. What some places are doing is using paper for disposable bags and selling actually long term re-usable bags for a little more like a 2-5 bucks a bag mostly.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah the idea that people buying a dozen polyester bags made of substantially more plastic that still gets thrown away by people on average is not great. Our fast scramble approach to solving issues is often awful like that though. Look at the waste that the turn from plastic straws caused all because of a school report about turtles.

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Don't get me started on fucking paper straws...

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

And cats! Cats love paper bags!

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand. You've had cashiers break your shit, and therefore you prefer they do the bagging?

[–] qfjp@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bring your own bags => cashiers toss stuff into cart and break things, because you have to bag your own stuff.

Cashiers bag stuff => less things break, because stuff is bagged then put in the cart.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Here, everything goes out on a belt where you have to bag it yourself. The cashier never touches your cart or items apart from scanning them.

Costco recently came to my country and it feels so incredibly weird to wait for someone to first unpack your stuff and for someone else to scan it, and then someone else packs it again.

I am not sure how to put it, but I almost feel humiliating in a way.

It's also pretty common in grocery stores to walk around with a handheld scanner which you dock when done so you can pay. The great thing about this is that you bag your stuff while shopping and when you pay, it's already bagged.

[–] balisada@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah. Piling stuff on another belt so we can bag it ourselves is the norm here as well. I find it fascinating that I will simply pile everything into a haphazard pile on my side of the cashier, but when the cashier scans it, he/she usually piles it up into a very nice and tidy organized group.

[–] AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What country is this if you don't mind me asking. If uncomfortable with answering , no pronlem. Also, they have hand scanners for everyone?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, anyone that is a (free) store Member can use the scanners.

Note that not every store has those, only bigger grocery stores do.

[–] qfjp@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago

I see, that explains the confusion.

Costco recently came to my country and it feels so incredibly weird to wait for someone to first unpack your stuff and for someone else to scan it, and then someone else packs it again.

I'm in the states, but I still kind of feel weird having them do this. That said, they're much faster at it than me and lines are always huge, so they probably prefer it this way.

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I wasn't clear. In the olden times, a bagger (or the cashier) nicely packed the stuff into bags making sure not to break shit. All the stores around me now just yeet shit back into the cart after scanning it with no regard to what it lands on or if it breaks.

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

And cats! Cats love paper bags!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The irony is that the plastic bags became the norm over the paper bags because they were thought to be more environmentally friendly, over the infinitely recyclable paper that literally grows on trees.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The manufacture of plastic bags produces much less carbon emissions than paper bags. Consider the costs of logging, transportation of wood, the manufacture process which uses a ton of water, the transportation of paper which is heavier than plastic which means higher fuel costs, etc. And also consider that most trees we cut down from paper come directly from farms which often require irrigation or items like fertilizer (which have carbon costs). Although not every tree farm uses that, some are more "natural growth"

Plastic bags tend to be more durable and re-usable than paper bags. Unfortunately most people don't re-use either.

Of course, the main issue is the fact that they take hundreds of years to decompose and end up everywhere. Also, plastics come directly from petrochemicals which are a finite resource. There are ways to create plastic from renewable oils, although that raises the carbon emissions significantly.

I think this is an excellent example to give people to illustrate that a lot of times, the choices we make as a society about simple things can be counter-intuitive. Often times, we're making decisions about what bad thing we want less. Do we want plastic building up in landfills and oceans, or do we want the global temperature to stop rising?

Of course, these aren't the only two options and it's not a 1 to 1 linear relationship. But it's an interesting example.

[–] balisada@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I remember when plastic bags became a thing. We were encouraged to use a plastic bag to save a tree.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Paper is not infinitely recyclable.