this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
19 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
51
Anybody else here dislike how beehaw is becoming a bit of a hub for the israel-palestine talk? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bermuda@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don't wanna dive super deep into this, but ever since the news broke it feels like this place has become a hub for shit-flinging from literally everybody about the topic. Sure, I've seen some nuanced opinions and some people attempting to have a normal human conversation, but I just dislike people using this particular instance as the "place to be" to continue this endless flame war. Isn't this counter to the goals of the instance? How many of us come here to argue like children about geopolitics?

Plus, a lot of the people I've seen pointlessly arguing about this have accounts from other instances... I've even seen one person post on their beehaw account, get flak for it, then switch to kbin for no reason.

And at the risk of sounding too conspiratorial, something definitely seems off about a lot of these comments. Maybe it's how a lot just seem to be infodumping. I dunno.

It's only been a few days. Maybe it'll simmer down. But I don't like the direction this is going.

Edit: I'm not recommending we censor political discussion, however in this particular instance I would say it's wise to take a step back and think about what we say to each other

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bermuda@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely recommend looking into OP's position on dead civilians, from their past comment history.

I don't want to take a side in this but I just find those comments thoroughly reprehensible.

[โ€“] Omegamanthethird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The OP clearly crossed from "acceptable" civilian casualties to actively rooting for civilian casualties. In this case the mods would be justified blocking them.

But I'm also happy to see that overall they're not voted up.