this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
285 points (94.4% liked)

memes

9615 readers
2636 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

I'm glad Chuck Norris memes are dead.

Guy tried to use his Internet clout to spread homophobia and endorsed anti-LGBT extremists.

He should have just kept his mouth shut.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Chuck Norris is just Gigachad from Wish.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Giga Chad as a concept promotes being at peace with yourself, bettering yourself and making yourself a better person in society.

Chuck Norris as a concept mostly promotes toxic masculinity and "being badass", a proclamation of toxic superiority that is unattainable.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Giga Chad as a concept is used by whoever wants to use it to justify anything they want by saying "'cause I'm a Chad". In the same way that Chuck Norris did. 90% of the memes for each can be replaced with the other and lose almost no relevance. Someone can use a giga Chad meme to say "women's rights are a joke" and the same for Chuck Norris. They can also say "defending the homies when they want to share their feelings to the bros". I'm not saying the Chuck Norris memes are guilty free or whatever, but the giga Chad memes are far being used only for "making yourself a better person"

load more comments (5 replies)