skisnow

joined 1 month ago
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you think that replacing a person with an object cannot be an artistic choice

Literally nobody is saying or thinking that. What we are saying is that there is absolutely no way that OP's prompt contained "...and make the optimist BE the glass itself...".

The irony is that you're giving OP way more benefit of the doubt in your reading of what they produced than you've given me, and instead argued against a complete strawman.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Fascist criminals like Yaxley-Lennon in the UK cry about their free speech, and when you look at the cases it's stuff like trying to intimidate juries, or inciting crowds to set fire to buildings containing asylum seekers.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

There's numbers for testing CC software.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (13 children)

You have my sympathies, but that still doesn't mean you get to post complete nonsensical garbage where a glass of water is talking for no reason, that took you less effort to create than it did to read, and expect people to not tell you to jog on, when there's a whole wealth of creative artists out there who are putting in the energy but getting their space flooded with slop.

The web has objectively become much, much worse in the past 12 months because quality is getting drowned out by quantity.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. That's literally the only reason why you would do it.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Don’t talk about ability to draw as though it’s some sort of elitist trait denied to the working class. People who can draw can do so because they put the hours in.

If you can’t be bothered putting the effort in when expressing yourself, why the hell should anyone else be interested in what you have to say?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The reason this one is blatant AI is that the imagery doesn’t make any sense. Why is the glass of water itself the optimist?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago

The downvotes are for the unnecessary holier-than-thou rant at the end attacking everyone using this very site.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 98 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Consult the chart

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

It took a sinister turn right at the end...

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be clear, when you say doctors endorsed cigarette smoking, a small percentage of doctors were duped into endorsing it and their recommendations boosted by the tobacco industry.

I've got my Grandfather's old copy of The Boy's Companion published before the date in that meme, and it's very clear in its message that smoking is bad for you. They've known it was harmful to health since at least the 17th century, and tobacco was only brought to Europe in the 16th.

The cunts who sent that mascot to the hospital fucking KNEW. (edit: or at least they would have if they existed, it looks like the whole thing might have been AI generated)

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was created by an Elon Musk superfan who identified himself to ARTnews as a French tech entrepreneur under the pseudonym “Louis XXII."

His other pseudonyms include Adrian Dittman and Doge Designer

view more: ‹ prev next ›