Just tell him respectfully, sometime.
As a parent, myself:
The answer is 2.
Cling to known humans who write their own code.
Snake oil salesmen always encourage the public to bet against the experts, with predictable results.
Someday ethically sourced AI can be used responsibly by trustworthy coders.
But the key is choosing to collaborate with trustworthy coders.
There's been some great ideas here, but I like yours the best.
Bill Burr complaining about being forced to be the pope would be amazing.
"I'm not going to lead mass. Leading mass is Charlie Work!"
Does anyone have any clue?
My best guess would be some relatively passive notification stealing focus.
As reddeadhead mentioned, there's specific "don't steal focus" settings. I've had good luck with them.
Great analogy.
I think it's fair to tweak it and leave that second library with full accountability for the lack of desirability.
Domain names don't start out undesirable, they build their reputation from the content and users.
So it's like building a second library in a perfectly nice spot, and having that library attract people who dump pollution into the surrounding area, making it undesirable.
I don't know enough about it to confidently say they're going to lose all their money
It happened to my relative. They didn't lose everything, but they lost enough that they're shopping for a mobile home for retirement, when they previously could have bought a small house.
Plausible explanation.
Immutable distros can usually be set to mutable with the correct privileged command.
It's essentially security by obscurity. But I disagree with "no benefit". An infection miss through dumb luck is still a miss, after all.
Uh... So no gift. Got it.