this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
149 points (93.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

28968 readers
508 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Like when the creator does their spiel for whatever sponsor.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 84 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That's what sponsor block is for.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can download the entire SponsorBlock database (see https://sponsor.ajay.app/database and https://github.com/mchangrh/sb-mirror ), so it should be possible to calculate a reasonably accurate answer to OP's question.

You'd need to estimate for the videos absent from the database, of course.

[–] SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does SponsorBlock work with Invidious and LibRedirect in general?

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago

Invidious is supported according to the plugin description: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/sponsorblock/

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is there a way to combo sponsor block with YouTube dl?

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yt-dlp works, not sure about youtube-dl

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

That's amazing! Thank you!

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Well, then we'll never know!

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 50 points 7 months ago

Sponsorblock has an interesting stats here: https://sponsor.ajay.app/stats/

They have over 15 millions segments blocked. Not sure how many of them are ads and what's the total lengths of those ads relative to the actual video though.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 22 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Sometimes the creators do funny ways to introduce their sponsors, I really like that. For example donut, even if it's a fun skit they even place a progress bar on the bottom. It's the main reason I set sponsorblock to "notify, but don't skip the segment"

Other times instead it's the whole video to be secretly sponsored, like many unboxing channels. In that case sponsorblock should warn "error: no content found"

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love Jay Foreman's sponsored segments. Absolutely hilarious stuff at times.

[–] Sparhawk97@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Second this some of the only sponsored segments I don't mind watching.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Map Men, Map Men,

[–] Lazhward@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

SponsorBlock already flags fully sponsored videos in the thumbnail.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago

oops, didn't notice that (using alternative clients)

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I love creators that make a skit for their sponsors. Sadly only few of them do this.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Internet historian sponsor segments are hillarious.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you feel about creators plugging their own product…for example, when Mark Rober (YouTube celebrity, engineer) plugs Crunchlabs (his subscription/box service for STEM kits for kids)?

Or when people plug their Patreons?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago

well, in that case i completely hated the video. mark rober usually makes excellent videos, but the latest videos were just excuses to plug his crunchlabs subscription or that masterclass thing.

[–] DuckOverload@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Harry Mack does freestyle raps about his sponsors. I think his bars about Keeps hair medication service and Nord VPN are just as entertaining as the rest of his stuff.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Depends how you define hard coded sponsors. Ad for Raid Shadow Legends or NordVpn, then quite little.

How would you count videos where Asus/Dell/HP/Milwaukee have sent hardware for review?

[–] Neato@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Untrustworthy. Real reviewers buy the product. If you are reliant on companies to send you product to review then you cannot be impartial.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

“Just to be up front I was sent this product free of charge for review. No money has exchanged hands and the company doesn’t get to review my video before I upload. “

So, if you write them a bad review are they going to send you one next time?

[–] TheActualDevil@sffa.community 3 points 7 months ago

If they make a bad product do you want more of it, even for free?

Like, reviewers get to the point where companies send them free product for review from a long period of legitimate reviews that get them a large enough audience. It's unlikely they're getting their main profits from free products sent.

Obviously you shouldn't take a single person's review as gospel anyway, but just them getting a review copy of a thing isn't a sole reason to discredit their opinion.

If the company is worthless, has no integrity, or is an idiot, no. Blacklisting an independent reviewer for a negative review says to me a company relies on dishonest shills rather than their own quality. "You didn't like that one? Here, try this one." at least takes some integrity.

Let's use the example of power tools. A reviewer is sent a tool, doesn't like it. Switch isn't very good, too heavy, motor breaks. So he produces a bad review, recommends against it. A shit company tries to prevent this guy from talking about them again. A good company says "Hey, will you try our new and improved version?" A company that takes their Ls and even listens and responds to criticism is worth paying for.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

I more meant if you require companies to send you goods to review for your business to work, then you can't be impartial.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

As long as I have seen a reviewer shit on a free product at some point, I'm fine with it. Otherwise I agree.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Sponsor Block just warns you if a video is an ad wholesale. So, logically, count the entire video.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

At that point it's not an ad, it's sponsored content

[–] pseudonym@monyet.cc 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Ironic that this is posted by "barqs has bite" lol. But yes I have wondered the same thing. I also wonder how much a certain sponsor influence the video topic. Like if you're sponsored by Nord VPN, are you more likely to do a video on Internet privacy or security?

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I also wonder how much a certain sponsor influence the video topic

Literally anything can influence the creator. I watch Max Miller's Tasting History, and he's unrepentant that he chooses certain foods to go with wine or coffee from his sponsors. But, he also makes entertaining history pieces to go with it, and that's what I'm there for.

Jon Townsend will happily sell you reproduction kitchen equipment from his own store, which is heavily featured in the videos.

At the end of the day, creators have to get paid somehow. Sure, some creators are doing it for free because they have a day job, or whatever, but even then you can be pretty sure they won't do anything to jeopardize their paycheck.

I think the most we can hope for is that creators tell us when they are are influenced by advertising.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 7 months ago

I posit that people who really know about internet privacy and security are the least likely to let themselves be sponsored by Nord VPN.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Username I’m seeing is “someguy3”