Gaming Industry Faces Peril Due to New Regulations – Are China’s Stricter Gaming Policies a Blueprint for Global Change? : games

[–] torvusbogpod@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Not sure if I'd call this "peril..." Call me a boomer, but if killing deliberately addicting feedback loops spells peril for the industry, then the industry has lost the plot.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.

The entire business model is an abuse. Only legislation will stop it. You were never going to shop your way out of it - it is the dominant strategy. If we allow it to continue, there will be nothing else.

I'm still not going to glibly endorse the actions of a dictatorship doing the right thing for all the wrong reasons. It is horrific that this human-rights black hole has such an influence on global industries, simply by dictating what its people are allowed to enjoy.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.

Counterpoint: Cosmetics. Developers get more money, whales and streamers get to show off, and the rest of us can still play normally.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Horseshit. You are guided to value whatever worthless crap the game sells. If that's the only way a game makes money - funneling you toward that is the only reason the game exists. That is what all systems exist for, and that is what the full might of developers' manipulative rhetoric steers you toward.

All video games make you value arbitrary nonsense. That is what makes them games.

Every form of 'it's only X, it's not as bad as Y' is just willful ignorance toward how Y served the purpose of separating you from as much actual money as possible, and X has the exact same goal but a sharper razor.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Games cost money to develop. Unless a game is open-source, you either pay a fixed price initially, or have microtransactions. The problem is when they get greedy and do both / make it pay to win. Selling cosmetics does not affect gameplay, so I don't mind them doing it.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Path of Exile is a good example. F2P, quality game, shit ton of content, and not once did I feel tempted to buy cosmetics. I did buy additional stashes once, but that was a conscious choice to support the devs after playing for tens of hours.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again:

You are guided to value whatever worthless crap the game sells. If that’s even the primary way a game makes money - funneling you toward that is the only reason the game exists. That is what all systems exist for, and that is what the full might of developers’ manipulative rhetoric steers you toward.

And if it's that or buying games, gee, can you guess which one I endorse?

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most players I know do not pay for cosmetics. 'Whales' - rich people who want to show off, or who love the game and want to support it - buy them. Some streamers also buy, but they get compensated by their sponsers. There is the occassional case of a kid buying it with their parent's money, and such purchases should definitely be reversed, but otherwise I see nothing wrong.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

There's also a good chance the so called 'whale' isn't actually that financially well off, and is being manipulated by the game into spending more than they can actually afford.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

'It only rips off some people' is not a defense.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

Don't bother, this guy is just absolutely out of touch and unhinged when it comes to games.

[+] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, I think it's a good tool for parents (that cares) teach good financial habits from early age. It might even teach parents themselves better financial habits cause a lot of our economics are based on impulse buying behavior. (whether the impulse is generated by superficial, seasonal, compare to Jones, sales and promotions, government rebates, etc. )

If we follow the train of thoughts and going backwards, any "feel good" purchases should not exist and it's an abuse to the consumer. ie. why should you buy a game the torture you for hours with difficult bosses, put you through lots of stress, agony, twisted plots that might make you cry or angry and then you get absolutely nothing you can hold on to except for those "experience" itself. Your console breaks, disk scratched, save file lost, etc and everything would be gone except whatever that's left in your memory.

Why do you buy [insert brand name] shirts, tie, shoes, jacket, blah? This literally extends everywhere.

Let those gacha, impossibly time limited events, all be life lessons. You simply can't get everything, your time and resource are limited, it take special kind of people and dedication(both mentally, physically and financially) to get what they can do. You can't be lucky enough to be a billionaire heir or oil princess? well, too bad, learn to accept reality, just like learning not everyone can make the cut to sports pro-league even if they dedicated their life training for it, genetics decides a lot of factors for that, same for e-sports.

If you can't even bother to teach your children those, well, maybe it's also hard to ask you to review your life decisions.

Once my son is old enough to do basic financial decisions with allowance, I will just let him decide if he wants to use that to buy snacks he liked or whatever in-game currency he wanted. Just like we can't all afford a Ferrari or [insert expensive car], we compromise and make decisions to make us survive and then be happy enough to keep going.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck them kids. This is a problem for everybody, adults especially. Kids are not the "whales" these bastards hunt.

Let those gacha, impossibly time limited events, all be life lessons.

Fuck that. Entertainment does not need to be a nightmarish morality tale about capitalism, let alone one that somehow costs real money! That's not a lesson. That's abuse with an added finger-wag. 'Tut tut, how dare you give us your money, like we tricked you into doing. Bet you won't do it another dozen times!'

Teach your kids to buy good games. Not to throw money at fake shit the game makes them value.

And stop shitting on strangers' hypothetical child-rearing skills in ways that highlight the failure of enforced civility. 'Can't teach your kids not to fall for scams? You must suck at life! Tut tut.' Infer vicious rebuke here.

[+] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You do realize that there are much worse scams irl for adults than gacha games right?

Unfortunately, human do learn "better" through experience (subject to personal trait that falls under a statistic distribution), and because of that a

shit I should've saved the money used for 20/40/60 dollar cosmetics/passes/event only unlocks for this new game that I really wanted

is much much better than

my [insert close relatives] maxed out my card now I am [insert big number] in debt.
shit I bought a [insert expensive big ticket item] and I can't afford to pay the monthly now, what can I do? (just go check any financial help forum)
insert that many other scams you can find common popped in forum that cost from hundreds to 100k+( cue people dump their retirement money into crypto )

I could afford to let my kid learn opportunity cost using the mtx, or dollar store toys, actual gacha eggs, etc once I start to let them handle their own allowance. They could also learn a bunch of marketing strategy that applies to them to make them dump allowance when talking with me later requesting to get more money to buy whatever they currently wanted. I'd rather spend that money as learning cost, than whatever forbidden method and then when they started working they dump their entire paycheck on those or even more expensive stuff because the sales convinced that they "can".

So yes, fuck them kids, let them stumble when they are short, let them trip to learn to pay attention on the road, let them whine for a month why they can't get extra to buy skin or whatever latest and greatest trending shit that some of their friends have because their physical or virtual piggy bank is empty. Fuck them with all the tricks at much smaller scale and let them learn from it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, does murder exist? Then I guess knife-point robbery is okay. Worse crimes mean this crime can't matter.

Better your kids learn from a mugging, right? I mean compared to murder it's no big deal.

Jesus Christ.

I could afford to throw my kid to the wolves and hope for the best

Or you could teach them economics with real products instead of scams. Not just "less worse scams." No scams. That's the ideal: zero scams.

And the reason for that ideal is adults. I don't give two shits about your children, in this context. They are irrelevant to why I am saying, this business model is a scam, and we should just ban it. Arguing that we should encourage that bullshit, specifically because it is a scam, specifically to take advantage of children, is batshit fucking stupid.

[+] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, I would never compare even 20 dollar bad purchase decision as to let them commit murder or feed them to wolves. I don't feel like continue discuss with you helps cause you can also see my other responses to why I feel it's a good tool for parents.

If you'd like to think this business model is a scam, then so do many other industries, like government run lottery or casinos, or trading card game, etc. Your logic is like "let's ban all bad things so they don't ever happen." right, good luck with that zero scam ideals, might as well try to build a no lying society?

When alcohol and cigarettes are scientifically proven bad to your health, look what our society decides to do with them?

I do the next best thing I can think of to educate and guide my kids, you do your effort to ban this type of business model, cool? I am not against that really, if you can pull it off.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Laws? Preventing bad things?! Preposterous!

Since when are scams illegal?

I reiterate: Jesus Christ.

You know what, sure, give your kids just a little heroin, to teach them not to do heroin. God luck and good speed.

Meanwhile - for adults - this entire business model is intolerable. You have access to your credit card. Right? You can blow your entire paycheck, not some measly allowance, on fake shit inside a ""free"" game. That's what it's designed to take from you. We don't fucking need it. It's infecting everything. We can just ban it.

If we do not ban it, there will be nothing else. For me, or you, or your smack-addict sprog. The entire video game industry is slowly being ruined by this bullshit, and your fusion-hot take is that we should let it scam children specifically because it's a scam. What the everlasting fuck.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's hard to argue with people thinking that giving a kid heroin is equal to let them open a gacha egg or lootbox and how they respond to the results. I don't know how you can make that connection and I'd like to see a reputable peer reviewed study where even expose once or a couple times lootbox and then they become untreatable gambling addicts. Show me anything and I will make personal call to the research institute asking questions and donate them, hosting a website and then spread it like gospel. You can't because that's not how gambling addiction works.

You are forming this "XXX = evil" argument and tag it's like feeding heroin to your kid. But provides nothing or alternative to help parents to catch those traits early. The same take away your entire pay check works for pretty many other things that are currently exists, like option trading, you wanna ban those too?

Lastly, you are also wrong about how the game industry works today. The whale hunters are moving to expensive skins in limited timed pass/event purchases to fomo their whale targets, the lootbox bussiness is shrinking even after the kompu gacha ban in Japan. People can sue and get (maybe not full) their money back, a couple case in Japan, EU, US and even Canada already.(most recent notable is the Epic lootbox/vbuck settlement case.)

The AAAs there are more games that recently come out without "any" mtx except digital deluxe and pre-order bonus, and they make banks compare to those in the F2P space. Which universe you lived in that all games become F2P and you are forced to play those and have to become addict to them? Check both out:

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/BestOf2022

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/BestOf2023

Notice any difference? There are less F2P titles in top platinum 1st~12th in 2023 than 2022, where is your version of F2P doomsday coming from?

And I hope your ban-this ban-that universe is so perfect that no one can scam, everyone is nice law abiding saints that work for free and help everyone in need. No no need to learn financial literacy and responsible spending behavior and you just need to hook this thing up before you sleep and your life will be perfect.

Come on, I am still waiting for your study that shows some miracle level of addiction triggering lootbox mechanics.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck your parenting.

For the last time: adults adults adults. This abuse is bad, for adults. I don't care about your children, at all, full stop.

YOU want this abuse to exist. You KNOW it's abuse. You have fully acknowledged it is a scam, but you LIKE the scam, because it'll teach your miserable spawn a lesson. Fuck that lesson. Fuck your kids. Scams are bad, actually. Fuck abusive business models. Fuck anyone who thinks addiction requires 100.0% of users to get addicted before we can call it deliberate psychological abuse to induce addiction for limitless quantities of actual money.

Why the hell would I need to name an alternative way to teach your kids about the orphan-threshing machine, when I am saying the orphan-threshing machine should not exist?

Why do you think "free" games are the only place this happens, when fucking Diablo has this garbage in it? This is coming to EVERYTHING. There will be nothing else, if we let it continue! It is the dominant strategy! Do you know what those words mean? Do you even care what words mean?

I'm inclined to say no, when you keep sneering as hard as you can about identifying intolerable abuse, as if saying "that's bad and it needs to stop" is a contradiction, unless I solve all problems forever.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

well, look at that simple finger pointing argument tech. As an adult you can do better.

Let me copy something I typed a bit earlier to a different guy that copied almost the same strat you use but less cursing. "Abuse means you are in a position where the victim can’t or don’t know how to say no to your malpractice." Let's see what my kid currently can ask me to stop:

humming, whistling, that make noise he caused since his youtube video stuck in my head
get one vegetable out of his plate and replace with a different kind he can take.
if he had enough tickling quota and asked me to stop any time.
right I forgot you don't care about my kid, maybe I should also stop here.

Any person without the addiction trait can just stop, the time it takes to get there varied by which part of distribution you fall on. As gamer we simply do so because:

there are newer better ones out there
you burned out grinding or simply tired of that price gouging shit throwing at you, you learn to identify those sales pitch and not get involved next time
you run out of money? you are in therapy? regain your self control after properly follow instruction to separate out access to available fund by a trusted 3rd party?
you simply don't like the game loop, that's what happened to me with MMO boom, I tried a couple and none of them attracted me.

Disclaimer: I probably have really high tolerance because of Monster Hunter, the OG rng drop action rpg where you hunt the same monster for 3 chances of 1% drop per hunt. My understanding of probability and other game mechanics to keep you there really thanks to this game. Where you burn time instead of money.

Gacha game itself is not an abusive practice, we have establish that cause the widely available statistics from many other existing industries(gacha eggs, trading cards, lottery, etc) I've mentioned before. If you don't like the game you simply stop playing. If you liked the game so much and can not stop playing, you might need to seek therapy as you fall under that group in distribution as "highly susceptible". And if you are a addict victim yourself, hating/banning all those that traps people like you does not solve the fundamental issues, including cursing and painting a internet stranger as some type of "enabler" or putting your words in my mouth, I am not going to repeat those.

I did not say it has to be free game for that to happen, but because free game relies on mtx and other mechanics to survive so they must have something else in game to get revenue. Actually, even free games are going away from that practice cause most people learn. Sharing knowledge is a great thing, people break down how much money you need to spend to get something or how many hours you need to grind in Diablo 4 for stuff pretty much less than one month after launch. They helped so many people before they fall into that "grinding pit". Any seasoned player will look for those before they even dip their hands in a game because of sunken cost fallacy, "I need to keep playing cause I invest so much time/money in this game already", instead of focus on "does playing the game is still fun?"

This is not coming to everything, let me show you a couple top selling game in last stretch of 2023(after Sep):

Baldur's Gate
Starfield
Cyberpunk(the DLC update and bundle)
Alan Wake II
Spiderman II
Super Mario Bros. Wonder

The games that receives really well but I don't have sales data:

Robocop
Lie of P, Lords of fallen (Souls like)
The Talos Principle 2
Avatar

What about other games that aren't even on my radar? Well, I don't care.

Like I mentioned, you do your thing, push for regulation, do your best and I'd hate to tell you that it doesn't work if you put that energy toward me instead of, say, running for legislation rep. As an adult you should know about this by now, I hope you learn and improve and push for your ideal society. Just like I learn a couple new words from your post even though it's just useless efforts to try get me upset about something baseless.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You are trolling.

This has been pointless.

Go away.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

Lmao a perfect summary of everything you shit out on this site

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is like teaching a child responsible drinking by giving him a handle of vodka a month at 12.

[+] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are much worse real life scam traps than the couple dozen or hundreds dollars worth of mtx (if your kid has that much allowance on their device.)

If he only have 20 a month he would have to come up with strategy to get what he wanted and then if he wants extra he has to work for it.

Your analogy would be like give your kid access to your bank accounts and CC without check. Learning opportunity cost without limited resource is a poor example.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These are designed to be addictive. You would be getting your child addicted to these loops early, grinding in that mentality early, and letting them loose into adulthood.

Its microdosing them on gambling meth.

[+] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather they share with me that experience and guide them compare to let them run into that much later in life while I was not around, make sense? If I can catch my kid that are actually have that addictive trait, I need to find out early and find therapy to help them building that mental wall or setup actual social/economical fence early on.(like register them to the blacklist from casinos etc so they get turned away even if they tried.)

Please don't compare bad spending decision to hard drug that permanently alter your brain chemicals/pathing.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gambling addictions are literally identical to the effects of a hard drug permanently altering your neurological pathing and brain chemistry. Take a psychology 101 class.

Thats why its called a gambling addiction.

Thats why there are a fuck load of laws around gambling.

Thats why lots of people want it against the law to put in video games.

Thats why literally everyone of sound mind is telling you that this is a horrid thing to do to a child

Getting a child addicted is not the way to try and find out if they have an addictive personality.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who said I want to get child to have gambling addiction?

Do you know not everyone expose to gambling will become addict?

Do you even know how that type of addiction works?

Do you even read and see if I find out early that if my child has that trait we can identify that from these early behaviors? (like blowing all the allowance and can not stop themselves and tries to stole CC/lie etc to just get another box open.)

Are you the type of person thinking not exposing this one thing will prevent you from other types of addiction or exploits?

Compare to hard drug that chemically changes and damage the brain and slower process where brain chemical that works themselves because of the reward stimulation is entirely different for those gambling addict prone is totally different. You are talking about the brain "response" to the stimuli, not the cause and how they form that feedback loops.

Not everyone is going to become gambling addict by opening a few loot box, or buy cosmetics. The fact that I can participate and observe how they work with "not getting what they wanted" if they get a gacha egg at mall or lootbox in a game is very cost efficient tool, Heck, you don't even need actual currency like mall gacha eggs, plenty of mobile game gives you virtual currency to do the virtual gachas or funnel you to do more of those until you are hooked.(see Pokemom Go)

And, I do not mind restriction and even encourage that there should be laws around those chance based things for both adult and minors. Because we do need those to help those that are prone and can become addict to have something that help them identify that and help them toward therapy. Virtual game gacha/lootbox is probably the lowest cost compare to any other real life addiction for detecting those personal traits.

Last and one more time, catch it early while they have full trust in me and work with therapy is going to cost 100x less then wall them up until they are 18 and then send them to the wild on their own. What kind of sick person trying to get their own kid become an addict? Which part of my post says I want to get my kids addict? What study supports your claim that if a child expose to lootbox and then they become untreatable when you identify the trait?

Do you realize that gacha eggs/capsules exists for more than 50 years? How many gacha eggs addicts you see everyday or in the study? Like I saw those when I am so small and my grandma's place still burn wood to heat water and cooking.

Show me any other more cost efficient way to trigger and identify that personality trait compare to a virtual game.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This massive meltdown over being told not to dose your kid on systems specifically designed by hired psychologist consultants to be as addictive as possible would be so funny if I wasnt sure you were actually going to get a real human addicted to gambling

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you know what's a distribution? There are no system in the world a fucking psychology Richard Feynman equivalent can pull to make everyone that touched it become an lootbox addict. (or whatever addict you'd like to call it. )

It's not a melt down because it's so hilariously bad I offer a challenge to let you show me "any" reputable publication that stats what you claimed with certain co-relation. In these categories:

open lootbox specifically designed to get you addict == micro dosing your kid with hard drugs
open how many lootbox when a person has that addiction trait will then become untreatable
any study that states opening lootbox with person that have addiction trait works exactly the same way to form the behavior feedback loop as hard drug addicts. (note: NOT how the brain respond to the stimuli "after" they become addicts. We have many hard drug user celebs examples that do not become addicts in Hollywood and Music industry. )

And, can I guess before hand? You have none of relevant qualification to make those claims, right? If this is r/science and I am wrong I will be slapped with pages worth of links by now. Go ahead, try educate this fellow stupid old man.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Youre gonna be such an abusive parent, fucking lol

You can google this shit, bud, china literally just banned these systems from games in their country because of how they are designed.

You can also google literally anything about gambling addictions.

Unfortunate that theres nothing stopping the future abuse of your kid

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Such poor display of integrity eh? Who has the burden to show stuff backing their claims? Right, the person that make the claims.

China does China shit to make Xi look nice and cause a stock market dip and then "might" loosen up the regulation. Unlike you, I include source:

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-regulator-earnestly-study-public-concerns-over-draft-video-gaming-rules-2023-12-23/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/23/china-considers-revising-gaming-rules-after-tech-giants-lose-billions

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-25/china-is-softening-stance-on-gaming-after-80-billion-rout

It's the same strategy politicians used here, it's the same type of thought process to trigger down vote without using brain cell to process we see here: "Think of the children, XXXX is bad."

Yes, I did, long before this news articles, before I even have kids. As neuroscience is part of my core interests. I don't religiously read or follow publications, not in that industry, but those related that posted on reddit or show up in my science curated youtube feed(which recently gone to shit because of generative contents) I just like to check and read about them. I saw nothing like you guys claimed. You have to show me otherwise to back up your claim. Or change topic like others and say this is abuse.

Yes, there is, it's called knowledge and understand the mechanics. Remember the experiment that nice well people can just "follow the order" and torture their subject? If you are not aware, you may learn something new today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

Oh, and abuse means you are in a position where the victim can't or don't know how to say no to your malpractice. My kid tells me to stop humming all the time cause his youtube music stuck in my head and I have obliged every time he said so, you know, trust building from young that he can refuse and stop things he doesn't like.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Im not providing sources because we both know that the time would be wasted. You dont want real sources, and youre going to abuse your kid regardless.

If I thought showing you facts mattered, maybe I would go through the effort of writing yet another college dissertation on the addictive designs of modern gaming through a psychologists lens.

But you know you dont care. A literal governement entity found enough evidence do enact laws to stop this and you brushed it off with some racist hand waving. Facts wont stop your abusive behavior.

Especially with logic like "I cant be abusing my kids, they tell me to stop humming sometimes"

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A person said something does not mean it's "facts", I am actually asking you to show me "the" facts, which you dodge and refused. Does that mean you just claim something baseless as facts? That falls under the category of misinformation.

A literal government entity found enough evidence

Well, let's stop right here, I am gonna assume I missed something, would you care enough and point me to an article that have links to such "evidence"? You are making a claim again that I didn't read anywhere, potentially missed or forgotten. Or are you suggesting that there must be some evidence to back this decision, without actually know if it exist or not? Does that mean the banning of abortion also have some "evidence" to support it? As they must be passed by a government entity.

AND, back to the topic, did you even read the links I provided? It literally says they will reconsider the terms and seek public comments, from a authoritarian government making a billions blunder announcement. They have did this so many times and back paddles because of the damage it did in the past as well. So are you saying they are caving because of billionaire pressure? Of all people but Xi? Dang, wouldn't that be hilarious? A communist dictator with science backed evidence caved under capitalist demands? WOW, look at that, such a lose of face and I hope the institute that suggest such idea and allow the announcement still exists next year.

Sorry I am enjoying this good laugh a bit much.

I care enough to keep wasting my time typing back, even though I know you don't have the integrity to find such article/publication to back you claims.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh nice, now you dont think china exists if I dont link you a google search. You need evidence that the country and people you just made racist comments about exists?

That makes your further racist comments kinda awkward, but Im not expecting consistency from someone trying to get his child addicted to gambling.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

This won't affect anything I enjoy playing at all.

[+] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

[deleted]

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Microtransactions are just an even more inbred cousin of nft's where there was never even a theoretical possibility of real value. Dailies and such are cancer if you have to work or do literally anything in real life. This would be a welcome change.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hope all Chinese "game" companys go bankrupt now :)

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That might backfire, seeing as most major game publishers are China-owned to some extent or other.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 1 points 10 months ago

The ones that let themselves be bought by the red plague dont deserve to exist! Greedy fucks.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I can't believe I'm calling China based for the second time in my life

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I have not really seen any reports or studies that show the harm of loose gaming policies. Yes, some are addicted and it is an issue, but is this worthy of government intervention in the context of all other issues? I am unsure. Love to see the data which seems to be absent here.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

A lot of these microtransactions are designed to prey on vulnerable individuals, at the expense of making the games worse for those who don't pay. It's an exploitative business model that should be outlawed.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It must be a real issue for them because it's a revenue stream via taxes as well, so they made this decision knowing it has a direct cost.

[–] BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

No. China sucks.