this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
986 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

35141 readers
206 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It doesn't matter how cheap solar is. Fossil fuels are still more profitable, because once a fossil fuel plant is built, it needs fossil fuel to run. You can't do the same with sunlight. We literally cannot shift away from fossil fuels under the current profit driven model.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NAS89@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unless you’re in California, where the second highest utility rates in the US exists and solar benefits are being capped by the state.

13% utility increase next year, a 95% increase in utility costs since 2014!

[–] comador@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then there's California where NEM 3.0 makes it less than worth while to install or upgrade your existing solar installation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›