this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
518 points (98.3% liked)

memes

15371 readers
3772 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 39 points 11 hours ago (8 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 28 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

In the sense that something designed to carry 8,000lbs can probably actually handle 10,000lbs? Or in the sense that if they both died insurance would still pay out?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

Yes.

Life insurance wouldn't be the problem. The problem would be if they lived and were injured. That would be a work comp nightmare. Just imagining getting that call is giving me a headache.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, you go on and test it for us then

grabs popcorn

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I have done way sketchier shit than that. That is like a 4/10.

[–] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, you can see in the picture it's being done successfully...

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

box with image of successfully built backyard grill

homer, lowering the image to reveal his monstrosity

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I can't imagine OSHA would approve this

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

One has to wonder. They have the equipment, someone saw fit to buy and and then use it.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah. But if its crazy but it works then its not crazy. Having said that there is no fucking way I would board the fail barge there.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 13 points 9 hours ago

If it's stupid but it works, it's still stupid, and you're lucky.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

It just isn't worth the risk. A scaffold could be built in ~30 minutes ( an hour tops) with almost no risk at all. I've worked at a facility with many tanks of water over 90k gallons each and we never would have pulled a stunt like that. Most had a permanent catwalk to service utilities above like lighting and plumbing.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

The only issue is they aren't wearing harnesses in case they fall off.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's ok, i see at least one hardhat

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 11 hours ago

They'll still have a brain to enjoy the quadrapeligia with

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 8 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Ok I'll take this as my opportunity to rant about a pet peeve.

Wearing a harness in this style of elevating work platform is more dangerous than not wearing one, and having a requirement to do so is part of what's wrong with work health and safety.

The only way someone falls out of this, beyond mechanical failure or tipping, is if they lean so far over the railing they fall out of it.

If I need to wear a harness in this, you need to wear one whenever you walk next to a balcony.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 20 points 10 hours ago

Nobody is going accidentally bump your balcony with a forklift or any other equipment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pirky@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Wouldn't it be better for them to be wearing life jackets instead?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›