This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
This has been known for years, this is the default assumption of how these models work.
You would have to prove that some kind of actual reasoning capacity has arisen as... some kind of emergent complexity phenomenon.... not the other way around.
Corpos have just marketed/gaslit us/themselves so hard that they apparently forgot this.
Employers who are foaming at the mouth at the thought of replacing their workers with cheap AI:
🫢
This sort of thing has been published a lot for awhile now, but why is it assumed that this isn't what human reasoning consists of? Isn't all our reasoning ultimately a form of pattern memorization? I sure feel like it is. So to me all these studies that prove they're "just" memorizing patterns don't prove anything other than that, unless coupled with research on the human brain to prove we do something different.
Agreed. We don't seem to have a very cohesive idea of what human consciousness is or how it works.
Of course, that is obvious to all having basic knowledge of neural networks, no?
So, what your saying here is that the A in AI actually stands for artificial, and it's not really intelligent and reasoning.
Huh.
You assume humans do the opposite? We literally institutionalize humans who not follow set patterns.
